no, i don't because your posts are mostly incomprehensible.
"if they are indicted" implies that you don't understand that they have been charged and warrants for arrest have been issued.
It's also not realistic to assume that a city would open itself to the liability of charging police officers just to appease the public and be fully committed to actually prosecuting them
"if they are indicted" implies that you don't understand that they have been charged and warrants for arrest have been issued.
It's also not realistic to assume that a city would open itself to the liability of charging police officers just to appease the public and be fully committed to actually prosecuting them
Comment