Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Global Warming is over.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Tldr on something as complex as global warming?

    You're a joke.
    AWD > RWD

    Comment


      It's wrong cause I saw it in a YouTube documentary once, srsly guys.

      Comment


        Originally posted by turge View Post
        TLDR. herp a derp derp...

        Comment


          Originally posted by Kershaw View Post
          Tldr on something as complex as global warming?

          You're a joke.
          TLDR on the thread... I've read up on the subject and it's over-exaggerated. It's pretty much just a scare tactic to get you to drive hybrids or non-gas powered cars.

          l2 read bro.

          Comment


            He's totally right, who else grew up on captain planet? Trying to brainwash us from a young age.

            Vote Santorum.

            Comment


              Originally posted by cale View Post
              Vote Santorum.
              over my cold dead body. gawd that guy is dumb and this is coming from a christian/right viewed person.
              Much wow
              I hate 4 doors

              Comment


                Originally posted by herbivor View Post
                Global warming is as much a theory as Evolution. I think you may be confused what scientific theories are. They are a description of facts, not speculation or hypothesis.
                friend you have a lot to learn because i'm embarrassed for you making this post

                they are, by definition, speculation and hypothesis
                “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
                Sir Winston Churchill

                Comment


                  A scientific theory becomes theory once it has verified or explainsd a hypothesis, it is not hypothetical it is just not strong to be considered law, which is an extremely difficult thing to achieve for a theory. The strength of a scientific theory is vastly superior to that of what can be defined as every day theory. Your attempts to downplay it does not speak well for you, the one who has much to learn here is yourself.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by gwb72tii View Post
                    friend you have a lot to learn because i'm embarrassed for you making this post

                    they are, by definition, speculation and hypothesis

                    Comment


                      lol.
                      AWD > RWD

                      Comment


                        isn't a scientific theory made up of hypotheses?
                        and verified is only true as long as no opposing data/evidence is discovered correct?
                        such as the now discarded theory the sun rotates around the earth (maybe new to you kershaw and cale).
                        you could say all of science is hypothetical as there is no such thing as settled science
                        “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
                        Sir Winston Churchill

                        Comment


                          Science uses specialized terms that have different meanings than everyday usage. These definitions correspond to the way scientists typically use these terms in the context of their work.


                          Science uses specialized terms that have different meanings than everyday usage. These definitions correspond to the way scientists typically use these terms in the context of their work. Note, especially, that the meaning of “theory” in science is different than the meaning of “theory” in everyday conversation.

                          Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” Truth in science, however, is never final and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow.

                          Hypothesis: A tentative statement about the natural world leading to deductions that can be tested. If the deductions are verified, the hypothesis is provisionally corroborated. If the deductions are incorrect, the original hypothesis is proved false and must be abandoned or modified. Hypotheses can be used to build more complex inferences and explanations.

                          Law: A descriptive generalization about how some aspect of the natural world behaves under stated circumstances.
                          Theory: In science, a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses.



                          A scientific theory is a set of principles that explain and predict phenomena.[1] Scientists create scientific theories with the scientific method, when they are originally proposed as hypotheses and tested for accuracy through observations and experiments.[2] Once a hypothesis is verified, it becomes a theory

                          By it's very definition a scientific theory is the findings of tested hypotheses, not the hypothesis itself. Continue with the condescension whilst brandishing your torch of ignorance, it's amusing.

                          Comment


                            Just the last four articles from the Science Daily. Articles like these are published every day. If one actually reads these articles on a daily basis, without wearing "conspiracy blinders", the support for AGW becomes as obvious as night and day.

                            Long-Term Studies Detect Effects of Disappearing Snow and Ice
                            ScienceDaily (Apr. 6, 2012) — Regions of Earth where water is frozen for at least a month each year are shrinking as a result of global warming. Some of the effects on ecosystems are now being revealed through research conducted at affected sites over decades. They include dislocations of the relationships between predators and their prey, as well as changes in the movement through ecosystems of carbon and nutrients. The changes interact in complex ways that are not currently well understood, but effects on human populations are becoming apparent.

                            Satellite Observes Rapid Ice Shelf Disintegration in Antarctic
                            ScienceDaily (Apr. 5, 2012) — As ESA's Envisat satellite marks ten years in orbit, it continues to observe the rapid retreat of one of Antarctica's ice shelves due to climate warming.

                            New Mechanism of Past Global Warming? Thawing Permafrost 50 Million Years Ago Led to Global Warming Events
                            ScienceDaily (Apr. 4, 2012) — In a new study reported in Nature, climate scientist Rob DeConto of the University of Massachusetts Amherst and colleagues elsewhere propose a simple new mechanism to explain the source of carbon that fed a series of extreme warming events about 55 million years ago, the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), and a sequence of similar, smaller warming events afterward.
                            While the amounts of carbon involved in the ancient soil-thaw scenarios was likely much greater than today, implications of the study appear dire for the long-term future as polar permafrost carbon deposits have begun to thaw due to burning fossil-fuels, DeConto adds. "Similar dynamics are at play today. Global warming is degrading permafrost in the north polar regions, thawing frozen organic matter, which will decay to release CO2 and methane into the atmosphere. This will only exacerbate future warming in a positive feedback loop."

                            Rising CO2 Levels Linked to Global Warming During Last Deglaciation
                            ScienceDaily (Apr. 4, 2012) — Many scientists have long suspected that rising levels of carbon dioxide and the global warming that ended the last Ice Age were somehow linked, but establishing a clear cause-and-effect relationship between CO2 and global warming from the geologic record has remained difficult.
                            A new study, funded by the National Science Foundation and published in the journal Nature, identifies this relationship and provides compelling evidence that rising CO2 caused much of the global warming.
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by gwb72tii View Post
                              isn't a scientific theory made up of hypotheses?
                              and verified is only true as long as no opposing data/evidence is discovered correct?
                              such as the now discarded theory the sun rotates around the earth (maybe new to you kershaw and cale).
                              you could say all of science is hypothetical as there is no such thing as settled science
                              intellectual dishonesty at it's finest. why even bother "participating" in these conversations if this is all you're going to say?

                              Comment


                                their called laws of science but gw is far far far from law,,, even though some would and try to argue otherwise

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X