Maybe you've seen the pictures floating around the intarweaves.
Some guy finds a dried out tiny skeleton in the Chilean desert some 10y ago, then a Spanish guy buys it, then recently Steven Greer get it in his hands. Everyone thinks its an alien.
Nothing unusual, like all the Chupacabras, mutated dogs out there and shit the ocean spews out and people call monsters and stuff.
The part that makes you scratch your head is that the body was taken to Gary Nolan, director of stem cell biology at Stanford University’s School of Medicine in California, obviously a guy who can't be called crazy and who had the balls to compare the DNA to his own, putting his scientific reputation on the line.
His findings make it a total mindfck.
I downloaded Sirius (the documentary that first announced the findings) and it is ibvious Nolan knows what he's doing. The rest of the film is a bunch of gibberish about free energy and extraterestrials, the usual stuff about declassifying governmental papers etc.
I'll be really interested to see if other scientists are willing to chime in. Nolan's papers are downloadable somewhere and he hopes that colleagues from other medical fields will look at the data and say what they think.
Btw: Since it's humanoid, we could clone it and have them do stuff around the house, fix watches, check engines through the intake etc.
I'd buy one.
Some guy finds a dried out tiny skeleton in the Chilean desert some 10y ago, then a Spanish guy buys it, then recently Steven Greer get it in his hands. Everyone thinks its an alien.
Nothing unusual, like all the Chupacabras, mutated dogs out there and shit the ocean spews out and people call monsters and stuff.
The part that makes you scratch your head is that the body was taken to Gary Nolan, director of stem cell biology at Stanford University’s School of Medicine in California, obviously a guy who can't be called crazy and who had the balls to compare the DNA to his own, putting his scientific reputation on the line.
His findings make it a total mindfck.
I can say with absolute certainty that it is not a monkey. It is human – closer to human than chimpanzees. It lived to the age of six to eight.
Obviously it was breathing, it was eating, it was metabolising. It calls into question how big the thing might have been when it was born.
The sequence that we got from the mitochondria [energy factories of cells] tells us with extremely high confidence that the mother was an indigenous Indian from the Chilean area. The other thing that immediately fell out of the analysis is that it's male. It probably died in the last century, if I were to make a guess.
The specimen had an apparently severe form of dwarfism and other anomalies.
The observed abnormalities do not fall into any standard or rare classification of known human pediatric disorders.
Clinically, given that this humanoid lived many decades to centuries ago, it is hard to understand how a six inch baby or child could have lived to be 6-8 years of age in such a remote and undeveloped part of the world. Even in today's best Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) we would hardly be able to keep such a specimen alive.
As an emergency physician, I have delivered premature infants, as well as a significantly deformed one with anencephaly, and am struck by how small and fragile this humanoid is. Medically speaking, IF this is merely a deformed human, it does not seem feasible that he would have lived to be 6-8 years of age. Speaking as a clinician, I, as well as other doctors with whom I have spoken, doubt he would have lived 6 hours. consistent with a human fetus of this size.
Obviously it was breathing, it was eating, it was metabolising. It calls into question how big the thing might have been when it was born.
The sequence that we got from the mitochondria [energy factories of cells] tells us with extremely high confidence that the mother was an indigenous Indian from the Chilean area. The other thing that immediately fell out of the analysis is that it's male. It probably died in the last century, if I were to make a guess.
The specimen had an apparently severe form of dwarfism and other anomalies.
The observed abnormalities do not fall into any standard or rare classification of known human pediatric disorders.
Clinically, given that this humanoid lived many decades to centuries ago, it is hard to understand how a six inch baby or child could have lived to be 6-8 years of age in such a remote and undeveloped part of the world. Even in today's best Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) we would hardly be able to keep such a specimen alive.
As an emergency physician, I have delivered premature infants, as well as a significantly deformed one with anencephaly, and am struck by how small and fragile this humanoid is. Medically speaking, IF this is merely a deformed human, it does not seem feasible that he would have lived to be 6-8 years of age. Speaking as a clinician, I, as well as other doctors with whom I have spoken, doubt he would have lived 6 hours. consistent with a human fetus of this size.
I'll be really interested to see if other scientists are willing to chime in. Nolan's papers are downloadable somewhere and he hopes that colleagues from other medical fields will look at the data and say what they think.
Btw: Since it's humanoid, we could clone it and have them do stuff around the house, fix watches, check engines through the intake etc.
I'd buy one.
Comment