M30, M20, m10 Turbo&NA HEADS Limited TIME Product,
Collapse
X
-
-
I read what he posted and got turned off by the idea of him working on my heads. If he can't back his work with numbers from the start we have problems. Dyno'ing a car won't tell me what I need to know because if he's doing head work he'll have a bunch of other mods to start the baseline off. He'd need to pull the head and flow bench it for the real numbers. E30 heads have to have material added to get optimal flow too.Originally posted by IRON-EYeah, you're definitely a vw
Comment
-
This isn't true. While yes, they already flow too much for a stock engine, they can certainly flow more with proper porting. Yes, I have a flow bench and have done research ;)
Comment
-
I read that thread a while back and found some good info, great write up!Originally posted by IRON-EYeah, you're definitely a vw
Comment
-
It's not that they flow too much, it's the terrible angle of the port into the combustion chamber. Material needs to go from the bottom onto the top. I think that's why the guy at RHD prefer the 731 as a base.
Also a good point by digger...
the 200 head is ideal for a small cc M20, the port entry is steeper and with oversize valves the short side can be hugely improved. I think for a high hp M20 stroker the 200 is just a little too small and will choke and you would have to eat into the steeper entry to avoid this and why the 731 in this case would be an easier starting point.
Anyways... OP you should be more concerned about the objective data rather than the pretty pictures and a sales pitch. Since you seem to only be able to provide flow bench results, it would be a good idea to research other peoples work/results and compare them to yours. If you are in the ball park, then your heads will sell no problem :up:Last edited by pantelones; 08-08-2014, 08:09 AM.Comment
-
I don't think OP has flow numbers.It's not that they flow too much, it's the terrible angle of the port into the combustion chamber. Material needs to go from the bottom onto the top. I think that's why the guy at RHD prefer the 731 as a base.
Also a good point by digger...
Anyways... OP you should be more concerned about the objective data rather than the pretty pictures and a sales pitch. Since you seem to only be able to provide flow bench results, it would be a good idea to research other peoples work/results and compare them to yours. If you are in the ball park, then your heads will sell no problem :up:
The 885 head flows more than enough for a stock m20 is what I was getting at. If you read my link, you will see we have already put time/effort into flow testing the m20 heads. With light porting in the correct areas, we see in the 180's CFM which is plenty - the manifold is what hangs it up. This is why "the RHD guy" gained so much with ITB's.
The stock system complete with manifold and TB attached barely flows 160CFM, a ~10CFM loss over a bare head (169-173CFM).
Every "backyard" ported head we tested flowed worse than stock, and decreased velocity due to more volume in the port.Comment
-
As I said when budget increases I will supply numbers From a flow bench when I have time. This isn't my full time job, it is an experiment to see if people need a service provided. I Never said to anyone that my work is better than someone else's. I simply said I am conducting a service to provide something new, because it's not available on the market that I know of.
I have access to 2 flow benches where I live. I will supply flow numbers as soon as I feel like I need to. But really I could care less of peoples opinions and don't need to have someone to tell me what I NEED to do.
I'm conducting a service. Anyone can try and prove otherwise to the statements I've provided for my business.
Thank you all for your awesome info, everyone provided for me. if the negative out weighs the positive. I will close this service. Thank you all.
Everyone had valid points. !!!! Good job everyone
I have a research file the size of a bible in my cabinet of only m20 motors.
I don't think OP has flow numbers.
The 885 head flows more than enough for a stock m20 is what I was getting at. If you read my link, you will see we have already put time/effort into flow testing the m20 heads. With light porting in the correct areas, we see in the 180's CFM which is plenty - the manifold is what hangs it up. This is why "the RHD guy" gained so much with ITB's.
The stock system complete with manifold and TB attached barely flows 160CFM, a ~10CFM loss over a bare head (169-173CFM).
Every "backyard" ported head we tested flowed worse than stock, and decreased velocity due to more volume in the port.Last edited by e30m20TurbO7; 08-08-2014, 03:04 PM.Comment
-
I have access to 2 flow benches where I live. I will supply flow numbers as soon as I feel like I need to. But really I could care less of peoples opinions and don't need to have someone to tell me what I NEED to do.
I'm conducting a service. Anyone can try and prove otherwise to the statements I've provided for my business.
Thank you all for your awesome info, everyone provided for me. if the negative out weighs the positive. I will close this service. Thank you all.
No! Please don't take your ball and go home! We really want to throw money at you
*couldn't care lessComment
-
Rebuilding heads and porting on a 30yr old platform is "new, not available on the market"?
We aren't trying to burst your bubble, but when someone claims they are doing a service/upgrade with no results, besides their own untested car/engine, the general enthusiast will be skeptical.Comment
-
-
I'm completely agree with this statement, I just won't lie about the testing that I've done, until I've done it. Budget has been low for this business for now, and family health problems is a concern
Rebuilding heads and porting on a 30yr old platform is "new, not available on the market"?
We aren't trying to burst your bubble, but when someone claims they are doing a service/upgrade with no results, besides their own untested car/engine, the general enthusiast will be skeptical.Comment
-
I understand your point, but at the same time people do not want to pay for work that may not actually provide them with any benefit.As I said when budget increases I will supply numbers From a flow bench when I have time. This isn't my full time job, it is an experiment to see if people need a service provided. I Never said to anyone that my work is better than someone else's. I simply said I am conducting a service to provide something new, because it's not available on the market that I know of.
I have access to 2 flow benches where I live. I will supply flow numbers as soon as I feel like I need to. But really I could care less of peoples opinions and don't need to have someone to tell me what I NEED to do.
I'm conducting a service. Anyone can try and prove otherwise to the statements I've provided for my business.
Thank you all for your awesome info, everyone provided for me. if the negative out weighs the positive. I will close this service. Thank you all.
Everyone had valid points. !!!! Good job everyone
I have a research file the size of a bible in my cabinet of only m20 motors.
If you can provide flow numbers you are able to sell something that is "tangible" vs selling your rasping skills and vast family background.
It would be great if you can provide numbers and provide a good service but people will not pay without proven results.
I hope you can sort this out because it sounds like you have the ability to offer up some cool services!Comment
-
I have nothing to say to that. Thanks for your input.
It's for longevity purposes. For turbocharged applications
I understand your point, but at the same time people do not want to pay for work that may not actually provide them with any benefit.
If you can provide flow numbers you are able to sell something that is "tangible" vs selling your rasping skills and vast family background.
It would be great if you can provide numbers and provide a good service but people will not pay without proven results.
I hope you can sort this out because it sounds like you have the ability to offer up some cool services!Comment
-
-

Comment