Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

N52 Swap Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LukeJ
    replied




    Did you just bolt on the N54 intake manifold? Are you using any kind of adaptor? :-)
    Last edited by LukeJ; 05-04-2021, 09:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • hoveringuy
    replied
    Originally posted by nando View Post

    It's just cool that you can basically get to the power of a stock S54, but with the weight of an M42 (or less, actually).
    Here's compared to a highly-tuned S54 (not sure exactly what that entails..). That motor is putting down around 330whp, it's just not a fair fight. On the other hand, I also weigh 800lbs less.

    Also compared it to a hot M54, which peaked at 250whp at around 6700 but had a better bottom-end.

    Everyone at the shop was very surprised at what an N52 could do, for sure.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.JPG
Views:	573
Size:	67.8 KB
ID:	10016615

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Get me a dump of the calibration in PAsoft - should be 0x8400000 - 0x85FFFF (same mode as dumping ram). I can start looking for that spot at 2500rpm.

    It's pretty impressive considering the engine is entirely stock internally. I always knew these had a lot of potential. You could do MILVS and different exhaust cam rockers (basically the same thing as a cam swap), I bet that'd get to 300hp, but honestly with 288hp at 7500rpm, I doubt it would be worth the trouble.

    the 3-stage is probably better suited to the bigger cars, but the torque you're getting is plenty for a little E30. The downside was getting it all in tune since the intake/exhaust are so different from stock.

    It's just cool that you can basically get to the power of a stock S54, but with the weight of an M42 (or less, actually).
    Last edited by nando; 05-04-2021, 07:02 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • hoveringuy
    replied
    So yesterday we followed the dyno to the end of the rainbow.

    The car had been just "meh" at the last track session. Speeds were down from the M54 and fuel consumption was atrocious, but it ran smoothly otherwise.

    Took it to 22RPD "22nd Race Product Development" and the baseline pull showed 189 whp and the A/F was pig-rich, like 9.

    Now, these guys tune BMWs all the time and make some awesome high-horsepower cars. They know ECU's as well as almost anybody, but and even they had a hard time with it. There are a lot of different maps and operating modes in the MSV70 and they struggled with finding the best way to make corrections. Ultimately, after lifting the torque limits they adjusted the global fuel scalar which was effective. There's more work to be done, however.

    The graph I'm showing here shows a peak of 275whp at 6900 with torque 250 at 4700. In reality, the motor keeps pulling well into the 7's and we saw up to 288 at 7500. If we had lifted the rev limiter to 8000 I think we would have seen 300. S54 headers work that well.

    There's still one little rough spot at around 2400 rpm that needs some future work but I'm pretty happy with it.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Capture.JPG Views:	0 Size:	63.0 KB ID:	10016605 Click image for larger version  Name:	Capture2.JPG Views:	0 Size:	71.3 KB ID:	10016604 Click image for larger version  Name:	Capture3.JPG Views:	0 Size:	112.7 KB ID:	10016603
    Last edited by hoveringuy; 05-05-2021, 06:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • wazzu70
    replied
    Originally posted by nando View Post
    that won't help you because none of the RWD suspension will work with the AWD subframe. the pickup locations and mounts are totally different. And people who have done "RWD" swaps on the ix (using all ix front suspension), have found that the handling is.. not good.
    You would need to put an ix subframe in a RWD car (have to
    fab mounting location to match ix) and make custom LCA that replicate the RWD balljoint location.

    OR use an ix shell with custom LCAs and strut tower mounting location (if it could even fit in the confines of the ix tower). Maybe E36 stuff would be able to fit better.

    Bottom line is there is no bolt in solution or anything close.

    Leave a comment:


  • TobyB
    replied
    Hmmm-
    now I want to try cutting and shutting an E46XI subframe down to fit the E30.

    I'm sure it'd be a miserable failure, but fun to try.

    t
    haz welder

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    that won't help you because none of the RWD suspension will work with the AWD subframe. the pickup locations and mounts are totally different. And people who have done "RWD" swaps on the ix (using all ix front suspension), have found that the handling is.. not good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bmwtech07
    replied
    This may be a dumb question, but are the frames between the IX and the I the same where the subframes bolt up? It appears that a lot of the work for this swap is with the subframe/oilpan interference. I ask because I can get my hands on and IX that has a body that is rotted out beyond saving, and no interior, but the drivetrain and suspension are all there. If it all bolts up and there is enough clearance, it would be worth it to me to swap the front subframe/steering/hubs/suspension from the IX to make this work until there is a pan readily available. Is there something else that I am missing? (not including all the wiring, exhaust work, ECU tuning, ect)

    I love the idea of using the Tesla brake booster for clearance on the 3stage disa manifolds. I would build this for more of a summer fun car and not necessarily for track so the stock redline/powerband would be find for my needs...for now. Speaking of, are you still planning on using the Tesla booster?

    Leave a comment:


  • Caperix
    replied
    Looking forward to how your lap times improve as you get everything worked out.

    I did learn something new about n52 AC compressors by getting an incorrect part today. Apparently some 2011/12 e92 328's got an AC compressor with a clutch. The part number is 64 52 6 918 749, the car I was working on had the standard clutch less compressor so I do not know if there are any climate control differences.

    Leave a comment:


  • LukeJ
    replied
    [QUOTE=hubcapboy;n10014982]Steve's track day shows a remarkable level of dedication to shake-down. He might credit it to luck or some inherent quality of the engine that he made it a full day, but I know how this guy drives and he's pushing it.

    It's pretty remarkable that on the Rev 1 of most of this stuff that he could cane that thing around a track for a full day and not run into a lubrication, cooling, interference, or fueling problem.


    Yeah, it's quite the accomplishment. Excellent work Steve!!

    This thread is a wealth of information. Thank you to all the contributors!!

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    There are still some things to sort regarding tuning as well. I actually think there's nothing wrong with Steve's calibration, but the adaptation for valvetronic is "stuck" because we switched from a Z4 based tune to an E90 330i base (but with the CAN bus set to the older, E46 generation protocol). It's possible that some of the other adaptations are "stuck" as well, explaining the poor fuel economy and low power. His calibration is actually nearly identical to the one I use on my daily driver - the main difference is he has headers and the N54 manifold, while I have a 3-stage and MILVS with stock exhaust.

    Similar to how I got the external temp sensor to work again (I think it was stuck in some sort of diagnosis loop), I need to "unstick" the adaptation routine for his Valvetronic. I have some ideas to force it and hope to get it done this week.

    It's possible I could also do it by writing an E90 eeprom directly to his DME. The eeprom is where all adaptations and things are stored when the car is off. BTW, this means that "unplugging" the battery will not reset anything - errors, adaptations, mileage, coding etc - it's permanently stored in the eeprom. But the stored "adapted" values between the Z4 and E90 are different, which I think caused the issue with the radiator outlet temp and Valvetronic. Unfortunately, the only way to write to the eeprom is directly - with BDM, requiring physical access.

    Leave a comment:


  • hubcapboy
    replied
    Steve's track day shows a remarkable level of dedication to shake-down. He might credit it to luck or some inherent quality of the engine that he made it a full day, but I know how this guy drives and he's pushing it.

    It's pretty remarkable that on the Rev 1 of most of this stuff that he could cane that thing around a track for a full day and not run into a lubrication, cooling, interference, or fueling problem.

    Regarding getting these swap kits into everyone else's hands, I'm reluctant to start releasing parts until we have at least one car fully sorted (now that Steve's is so close... maybe two... which would hopefully include mine). At the moment the parts we've designed are:

    -Oil Pan
    -Sump baffle
    -Engine Arms
    -Subframe adapters to take e46 motor mounts (mandatory... the engine arms are designed to mate to these)
    -330i 6-speed transmission mount (not needed if you use the lighter duty 328i 6 speed... it's short enough to use the factory e30 5 speed bracket)
    -OIl pickup adapter
    -Oil pickup mount

    I don't think it's realistic (for me, right now) to sell this as a no-welding-required kit unfortunately, There's too many variables for me to guarantee/customize each instance, and I introduce even more if I add the cost of having someone else assemble them. I think the best case right now is to expect that these will be tacked together to define geometry so that you can DIY the structural welding and seams on the pan and include all the features in the location you want (PCV drain, dipstick, sump drain, oil level sensor, it's more than you'd think).

    I had a big push a few weeks ago and it strained things around the house and I've been holding off now... so progress has not been great. We have at least one more local swap in progress that I'm happy to support, but beyond that I'm waiting until we can confidently say "at least one way of doing everything is figured out," because I don't want to deliver a bunch of parts and have a group of people waiting for the next news.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    You definitely need to modify the pan for the ix I have a bunch of spare pans and an aluminum flange that these guys had made for me, it's a matter of cutting up the stock ix pan, making a jig, and welding it to the new flange.

    Actually, if you converted the ix to RWD, the stock N52 pan fits perfectly, lol, but a RWD converted ix is a waste of time...

    Leave a comment:


  • Bmwtech07
    replied
    This is great progress! Has anybody committed to a group buy on the oil pan? I'd buy 2! I have access to a parts ix, has anybody confirmed fitment on the ix setup without modifying the pan? Is there any progress with the tesla booster? I've done the s52 swap. It seems only logical my next build be an N52.

    Leave a comment:


  • hoveringuy
    replied
    First track day of the year! So how did it do?

    First, Nando, was nice enough to update the tune to both make the water pump run slightly faster, so I had cabin heat, and fix the radiator outlet temperature so that the aux fan worked properly and I had cooling. Both of those worked GREAT.

    Overall, the motor was down on power from the M54 I had last year. My speed at the end of the straight was down from about 129 to 124 and it didn't pull as hard out of the corners. The M54 dynoed at around 245 so I'm guessing it's at 225-230whp presently. Power also got a little flaky after about 6200 and it didn't pull as hard on the top end as it should. It also used a lot of gas. I could run four 11 lap session with the M54 and still have gas to drive home; the N52 left me on "R" at the end of the third session.

    So, the motor is running in limp mode, which means that the timing has probably been pulled back quite a bit which explains the power and probably the gas, too. This will be fixed.

    The good news is that there were no other hiccups. The temp was about one needle width to the right of 1/2. No oil pressure issues, ZERO leaks. No banging, exhaust clearance or header heat issues. Started instantly, idled smoothly, sounds awesome! My driving was splendid, obviously.

    On deck: I'm pulling the entire engine wiring harness and swapping in a Z4 harness and IVM that will clean things up considerably. Once that's done the final hurdle is for Nando to figure out the maps and braniac stuff to make it run right.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.JPG
Views:	570
Size:	72.0 KB
ID:	10014735
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture2.JPG
Views:	600
Size:	65.3 KB
ID:	10014734
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture3.JPG
Views:	561
Size:	61.1 KB
ID:	10014736

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X