If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Extending the tower upward? That would cost more to fabricate/weld wouldn't it? Fabricating a thick steel plate would be less work and just as effective, wouldn't you think? Theoretically speaking it would. I don't know if it would clear certain rim choices, although I don't think it should matter.
So I have e36 m3 koni adjustables for all 4 corners for my 5 lug setup from an e36 m3 (external top adjustable). I really don't feel like biting the bullet and buying a new set of rear koni adjustables to match the front as they don't sell the e30 koni adjustable rears as a set (you have to buy all 4). So I was thinking, because the e36 shocks are 2 inches longer and cause the e36 shocks on an e30 chassis to bottom out more often, would it be feasible to fabricate a bracket that bolts to the existing mounting point on the trailing arm that allows the shock to sit lower allowing more travel and not bottoming out the shock?
Its just a quick thought. Spur of the moment kind of thing.
Also is the body of the absorber the main difference between lengths of the shock or the shaft + body?
Leave a comment: