5-Series Showoff Thread
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
knew a guy with the saabaru, he said all the fun of the WRX but half the insurance cost because it looks like a boring station wagon to the insurance companies. -
I think it's called a 92-x areo. Yea, a re-skinned Impreza WRX Wagon. Honestly I think Saab did a much nicer job on the front end. And you don't have to say you drive a Subaru!Leave a comment:
-
^ George he has rotiforms for it but they are being powdercoated at the moment
Leave a comment:
-
I'm kinda digging that Saab. Needs some better wheels though.Leave a comment:
-
some pics from today - nothing new on car

DSC_0617.jpg by 5Toesss, on Flickr

DSC_0610.jpg by 5Toesss, on Flickr

DSC_0667.jpg by 5Toesss, on FlickrLeave a comment:
-
Pm'd with email addressThanks for the kind words. The ride is good for the most part. But, due to the unshortened shock housings w/ full length shocks and paired w/ low spring rates. I hit the front bump stops when tall uneven surfaces or large dimples on the road appear (due to how low I am). Plus, I have Moosehead Engineering Spherical UCABs, which makes the ride harsh at times. When I had my coilovers adjusted half way up the sleeve, the car rode beautifully. Bottomline, these coilovers aren't mean't to go low. But perfect for a conservative drop. In the future, I will be installing the complete ground control package...
In regards to the front bumper. It's just the stock US early valence, which I cut to the right dimensions to fit the euro turn signals flush in. This will do for now until I find a set of decent euro chrome bumpers. I am hoping I do the euro treatment soon, because I am getting tired of being bumperless. IMO looks cheesy/cheap lol. Once again, Thanks! I appreciate the feedback! I can PM you detailed pics of the front you're that interested. LMK...Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for the kind words. The ride is good for the most part. But, due to the unshortened shock housings w/ full length shocks and paired w/ low spring rates. I hit the front bump stops when tall uneven surfaces or large dimples on the road appear (due to how low I am). Plus, I have Moosehead Engineering Spherical UCABs, which makes the ride harsh at times. When I had my coilovers adjusted half way up the sleeve, the car rode beautifully. Bottomline, these coilovers aren't mean't to go low. But perfect for a conservative drop. In the future, I will be installing the complete ground control package...
In regards to the front bumper. It's just the stock US early valence, which I cut to the right dimensions to fit the euro turn signals flush in. This will do for now until I find a set of decent euro chrome bumpers. I am hoping I do the euro treatment soon, because I am getting tired of being bumperless. IMO looks cheesy/cheap lol. Once again, Thanks! I appreciate the feedback! I can PM you detailed pics of the front you're that interested. LMK...Last edited by J-aec; 06-10-2013, 10:04 AM.Leave a comment:
-
The stance is just right - great job of dialing it in. How's the ride? I'm liking the no bumper front - any more pics of it?Originally posted by J
[URL=http://s66.photobucket.com/user/Jaec86/media/My%20e28/WP_000023_zps542fef9c.jpg.html
[/URL]Leave a comment:
-
-
-
-
Just like I said. HD93 (US Spec) M5's started in Nov. or Dec. 1989...so that's 6 months worth of the very first US E34 M5's that it was 'standard' on...and not many people optioned it. So...again...NOT your typical M5 seats...your best shot at finding some are likely to be the wrong colors anyways...1989 tan isn't the same as 1992 tan...from http://www.bmwmregistry.com/model_faq.php?id=12#5:
...all E34 M5s built before September, 1990 have a fixed rear center console that effectively makes them four-seaters. This console became optional in most markets starting with September, 1990 production.Leave a comment:


Leave a comment: