Why Do People hate the 318 so much?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Highway1
    replied
    Crap, i didn't mean to create an m42 vs. m20 discussion.
    back on topic... kinda. m42's ftw :p

    Turbo?


    NA?





    info on the NA setup:

    here's a detailed list of the complete install possibilities


    Performance kits for BMW M42B18 Engines


    Step I : Upgrade to 114kW / 156HP
    includes:
    • A throttle body injector system 1453,--
    • Complete software update 355,--

    • Fitting of the throttle body injector system 261,--
    at dbilas dynamic

    Completeprice including fitting at dbilas dynamic 1995,--
    You save 74,--


    Step II : Upgrade to 124kW / 169HP
    includes:
    • A throttle body injector system 1453,--
    • A set of sport camshafts 587,--
    • Complete software update 355,--

    • Fitting of the throttle body injector system 261,--
    • Fitting of the sport camshafts 294,--
    at dbilas dynamic

    Completeprice including fitting at dbilas dynamic 2850,--
    You save 100,--


    Step III : Upgrade to 132kW / 180HP
    includes:
    • A throttle body injector system 1453,--
    • A set of sport camshafts 587,--
    • Cylinderhead and Valve modification 845,--
    • Complete software update 355,--

    • Fitting of the throttle body injector system 261,--
    • Fitting of the cylinderhead 717,--
    and the sport camshafts
    at dbilas dynamic

    Completeprice including fitting at dbilas dynamic 4090,--
    You save 128,--


    Step IV : Upgrade to 140kW / 190HP
    includes:
    • A throttle body injector system 1453,--
    • A set of sport camshafts 587,--
    • Cylinderhead and Valve modification 845,--
    • Complete software update 355,--
    • a/N 2000 control unit to replace the 889,--
    air flow meter

    • Fitting of the throttle body injector system 261,--
    • Fitting of the cylinderhead 717,--
    and the sport camshafts
    at dbilas dynamic

    Leave a comment:


  • tjts1
    replied
    Originally posted by 2002maniac
    I strongly disagree. I have tried both 3.64 and 3.73 and both returned worse mileage than 4.10 gears. The M42 simply does not have enough torque to go lugging around in the lower revs. 3500-4000 rpm on the highway IS NOT A BAD THING.
    Thats because you're doing it wrong. And yes 3500-4000rpm highway is a bad thing. Its bad for my ears.
    Originally posted by nando
    I disagree on the good design. The crappy timing chain system that has a tendancy to grenade and profile gasket are two pretty big strikes against it, plus the inner oil pan bolts falling off and blocking the oil pump and the ungodly nightmare of vacuum hoses under the intake manifold.
    I'll be sure to let you know when my crappy timing chain and profile gasket 'grenade'. Going on 170k miles and counting. Don't hold your breath.


    Leave a comment:


  • FL318is
    replied
    I just woke up so my brain is fuzzy but, what is Rob in the poll?

    Leave a comment:


  • Highway1
    replied
    Originally posted by Wh33lhop
    And what percentage of that would be due to owners neglecting proper maintenance?

    We've all heard plenty of M20 t-belt horror stories, they all usually end with "I really should have replaced the timing belt but I didn't."
    ouch... this is very true :) but having to change a timing belt every 50K is part of the design of the m20 motor. if you buy a m20 the first thing you should always do is change the t-belt just for piece of mind right? that is maintenance i can live without.

    Just to be clear. i love m20's i just hate when people name a few minor flaws in the m42 and then call it a piece of shit. Motors are like people no one is perfect.

    Leave a comment:


  • Streichholzschächtelchen
    replied
    Originally posted by Wh33lhop
    And what percentage of that would be due to owners neglecting proper maintenance?

    We've all heard plenty of M20 t-belt horror stories, they all usually end with "I really should have replaced the timing belt but I didn't."
    Stole my thunder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Streichholzschächtelchen
    replied
    Originally posted by Highway1
    Your right, they were very subjective questions but still, I would put money down that the percentage of m20's that break down due to timing failure is greater than m42's.
    And I'd be willing to bet that an extremely large percentage of those failures are due to irresponsible owners telling themselves they'll get around to swapping belts, or not knowing shit about the car in the first place. I mean, stupid people are in an abundance. Proper maintenance is common sense yet I have yet to hear a story about a snapped belt that wasn't the owners fault in some way.

    That having been said if you like e30s and have any schooling past the 2nd grade the m20 is for you. :pimp:

    Leave a comment:


  • Wh33lhop
    replied
    Originally posted by Highway1
    Your right, they were very subjective questions but still, I would put money down that the percentage of m20's that break down due to timing failure is greater than m42's.
    And what percentage of that would be due to owners neglecting proper maintenance?

    We've all heard plenty of M20 t-belt horror stories, they all usually end with "I really should have replaced the timing belt but I didn't."

    Leave a comment:


  • abefroman
    replied
    hmmmm....not touching this one

    Leave a comment:


  • Highway1
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    How often you "hear" something is highly subjective.

    How many more M20 engined E30s were sold compared to M42's?
    Your right, they were very subjective questions but still, I would put money down that the percentage of m20's that break down due to timing failure is greater than m42's.

    Leave a comment:


  • pbr87
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    How often you "hear" something is highly subjective.

    How many more M20 engined E30s were sold compared to M42's?
    So my car is rare!?!?!? :eeek:

    Leave a comment:


  • 2002maniac
    replied
    Originally posted by tjts1
    3.73 or 3.64 is ideal for the M42 but the stock 4.10 makes for a lot of revs on the highway.
    I strongly disagree. I have tried both 3.64 and 3.73 and both returned worse mileage than 4.10 gears. The M42 simply does not have enough torque to go lugging around in the lower revs. 3500-4000 rpm on the highway IS NOT A BAD THING.

    I will say the 3.73 make the car a bit more fun in 1st and 2nd gears, but everywhere else it sucks.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by Highway1
    hmm... i haven't had any of those issues.

    Ask yourself these two questions:
    How often do you hear of a bad timing system ruining a m42 motor?
    How often do you hear of a timing belt breaking on a m20 motor?
    How often you "hear" something is highly subjective.

    How many more M20 engined E30s were sold compared to M42's?

    Leave a comment:


  • abefroman
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    I disagree on the good design. The crappy timing chain system that has a tendancy to grenade and profile gasket are two pretty big strikes against it, plus the inner oil pan bolts falling off and blocking the oil pump and the ungodly nightmare of vacuum hoses under the intake manifold.
    I have one, and couldn't agree more. Gotta make sure to drop the pan and put some locktite on those bolts. As for the crazy cooling/vac hoses under the intake, all that can be deleted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Streichholzschächtelchen
    replied
    Originally posted by Highway1
    hmm... i haven't had any of those issues.

    Ask yourself these two questions:
    How often do you hear of a bad timing system ruining a m42 motor?
    How often do you hear of a timing belt breaking on a m20 motor?
    Then ask youself this question:

    Who lets their timing belt snap? noobs? Lol m20 ftw.

    Leave a comment:


  • Highway1
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    I disagree on the good design. The crappy timing chain system that has a tendancy to grenade and profile gasket are two pretty big strikes against it, plus the inner oil pan bolts falling off and blocking the oil pump and the ungodly nightmare of vacuum hoses under the intake manifold.
    hmm... i haven't had any of those issues.

    Ask yourself these two questions:
    How often do you hear of a bad timing system ruining a m42 motor?
    How often do you hear of a timing belt breaking on a m20 motor?

    Leave a comment:

Working...