Why Do People hate the 318 so much?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cagedbunny
    replied
    Originally posted by FredK
    For DD duties an M42 is boring as watching Martha Stewart on TV.
    Nonsense. They're unusually fun for a daily. With the 4:10 and a lightweight flywheel, the car rips stoplight-to-stoplight. Granted, there's not much more there if you need to push the pedal further, but the car feels so eager and fun, I tend not to care.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wh33lhop
    replied
    Originally posted by Wh33lhop
    There are plenty of M42 fans here. Less weight over the nose of the car is always a big plus when it comes to flinging it into tight corners.

    Personally I'm a big inline 6 fan though, I'm done with 4 cylinders for now unless they're mounted behind the driver (or under the rider).
    I'm appending this post to exclude S14s in my statement. 320is 4 door, do want.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aptyp
    replied
    Stupid poll. M42s are crappy engines from factory, but there's no reason to hate them.

    Leave a comment:


  • stegosaurus
    replied
    Originally posted by Janderson
    My only gripe about them is they're totally gutless. The M42 makes good power at hi-revs, but falls flat on it's face when you get to an incline or off the line.
    Yeah, that just gives you an excuse to preload before you hit the hill. On some really big hills I have to get to 50-60 to keep from having to drop a gear. MA has big hills.

    IMO it's these kinds of things that add to the car's personality, I keep its tendencies in mind when I drive and I can't help but feel a little bit more attached to the car.

    Leave a comment:


  • FredK
    replied
    It's about turn-in. That instant you turn the wheel and the car just goes precisely where you point it, that's what 4 cylinder E30s are all about. At the limit is where it shines. I bet it'd make a pretty cool auto-x car.

    For DD duties an M42 is boring as watching Martha Stewart on TV. It also has a crap timing case design IMO. Bad oil pump? Enjoy removing the harmonic dampener, crank bolt, and timing cover.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wh33lhop
    replied
    There are plenty of M42 fans here. Less weight over the nose of the car is always a big plus when it comes to flinging it into tight corners.

    Personally I'm a big inline 6 fan though, I'm done with 4 cylinders for now unless they're mounted behind the driver (or under the rider).

    Leave a comment:


  • freeride53
    replied
    ^ very well put janderson.
    I've experienced this on mountainous roads.

    Leave a comment:


  • z31maniac
    replied
    I love my M42, need to do the lightweight flywheel/chip.

    Leave a comment:


  • dashboardmonkey
    replied
    I've never driven an M42 car, but I have driven an M10 car and an M20 car. I like the torque of the M20 over the M10 for sure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jand3rson
    replied
    My only gripe about them is they're totally gutless. The M42 makes good power at hi-revs, but falls flat on it's face when you get to an incline or off the line.

    Leave a comment:


  • e34john
    replied
    Cause we like to get to 60 before the stopwatch hits double digits.

    Leave a comment:


  • namsayin
    replied
    i want a 318is!

    Leave a comment:


  • TexasTerp
    replied
    I'm mixed, I much prefer the DOHC setup but I can't help but love my m20!

    Leave a comment:


  • 87e30
    replied
    If the appeal is gas then you're missing the point. Aren't those cars supposed to be about lighter weight and a rev happy driving experience?

    Leave a comment:


  • ak-
    replied
    I like em, but when you drive something faster later on, it kind of annoys you getting back into it.
    Other than that, I don't mind them. They are fun.

    Leave a comment:

Working...