Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What if BMW named its cars? E30 could've been...?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Andrew325is
    replied
    Yep, 325e is 2.7 liter. Early M10 316 & 316i are 1.8 liter. So the naming hasn't really ever matched the displacement. As far as I can tell it represents relative performance within the lineup. So just marketing basically.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andrew325is
    replied
    Originally posted by roguetoaster View Post

    But E30s aren't even E30s.
    What do you mean?

    Leave a comment:


  • e30davie
    replied
    Yes. Damn you BMW.

    Leave a comment:


  • E30SPDFRK
    replied
    Are we all forgetting the fact that 325e's are 2.7l?

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    They should've made electric cars and called all of them turbos.

    Leave a comment:


  • lukeADE335i
    replied
    Originally posted by e30davie View Post
    I'm not sure when it started but the numbers began not meaning the engine capacity. seems these days you can get a 323i and a 325i and a 330i that has the same engine capacity, maybe even the same engine? just more horsepower. different tuning, and turbos, who knows. All of the confusion.
    That started straight after the e30! The e36 323i had a 2.5L engine - the 323i basically had the spec level of the 318i, with a slightly detuned 325i engine.

    I like the simplicity of the 3/5/7 series naming too, can't really picture what BMW would have named their cars asides from the 7 series adopting the Bavaria name.

    Leave a comment:


  • packratbimmer
    replied
    The EH DRY-SIG

    Leave a comment:


  • ZeKahr
    replied
    BMW Roundel - named after the badge
    BMW Rapp - named after one of the founders

    Originally posted by e30davie View Post
    BMW had a good thing going where the "name" of the car described it (ie 318i, 3 series , 1.8L engine, 325i, 3 series 2.5L engine) - this seems like a very german way to do it. i like it. no questions.

    I'm not sure when it started but the numbers began not meaning the engine capacity. seems these days you can get a 323i and a 325i and a 330i that has the same engine capacity, maybe even the same engine? just more horsepower. different tuning, and turbos, who knows. All of the confusion.
    I’m surprised they still haven’t dropped the “i” moniker. It made sense to use it back when cars were transitioning from carbs to EFI but today damn near every car is fuel injected. Maybe it’s for marketing purposes

    Leave a comment:


  • e30davie
    replied
    BMW had a good thing going where the "name" of the car described it (ie 318i, 3 series , 1.8L engine, 325i, 3 series 2.5L engine) - this seems like a very german way to do it. i like it. no questions.

    I'm not sure when it started but the numbers began not meaning the engine capacity. seems these days you can get a 323i and a 325i and a 330i that has the same engine capacity, maybe even the same engine? just more horsepower. different tuning, and turbos, who knows. All of the confusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    Originally posted by Andrew325is View Post
    This is sacrilege. E30 is the best name for the E30.
    But E30s aren't even E30s.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewBird
    replied

    Götterwagen

    Leave a comment:


  • Andrew325is
    replied
    This is sacrilege. E30 is the best name for the E30.

    Leave a comment:


  • roguetoaster
    replied
    Haifisch
    Streitwagon

    Leave a comment:


  • E30-325iS
    replied
    The BMW R3V

    Leave a comment:


  • E30Gus
    replied
    I was thinking "Carl"

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X