I admit that I have the sickness you describe above. No matter what car I own, I always build it around some competition rule set. I can't just own a "fun car" built to no class rules... I've tried that, but there's something always itching at the back of my brain: "...you know with a few mods this car fits in ___ class really well". That's just how I am - and how everyone else on our team is. We're all.... racers.
And as such, we took the competition portions of the GRM to heart, especially the autocross portion. It hurt us all to place 7th in that event, even without any testing whatsoever. And I was a drag racer before I was an autocrosser, so having two DNF runs for our team in that portion pained me more. Yes, we still had fun. We got to skip work for 4 days - so that's always a plus! Yes, we're coming back next year, but we're hoping to do better in the competition. Does that make us "bad guys"?

Its cool that people can spend a year(s) building a car for the GRM Challenge, only ever desire to do that, and "not care about winning". Same goes for the majority of the LeMons teams, that wear the funny hats and only care about the beer and bar-b-q, not the racing part. Whatever floats your boat. :)
That's just not how I'm wired. I always care about winning. Sure, I have fun "just racing", and the building of the cars is also enjoyable, but in the end: I like the competition. Team member Costas' own LeMons team is deadly serious, and they've done quite well in the competition portions each time (placing 2nd in their first event). He's running the true 24 hour LeMons event in November in their Camaro, and they want to WIN.
What I'm trying to say is: the competition element is the "fun" part for us.

We also built this E30 to more than just the GRM rules - we built it to do multiple competition events, which limited what we did greatly. We didn't just want to build it to do well at GRM Challenge, we also wanted it to be able to transition into an SCCA autocross class and a NASA Time Trial class. So it had to do EIGHT things well... car show, drag race, GRM autocross, SCCA autocross, NASA TT, UTCC, and kept it street worthy. And did it all staying under the $2010 cap, using the GRM budget rules. We poured over hundreds of pages of competition rules and every single previous GRM event results/published build budgets trying to make sure we didn't cross the line anywhere.

Every car we've ever owned had some competition class it was built around
I've been an autocrosser for 23 years, because of the steady and consistent competition element. I've put up with the sluggish Solo Events Board's obtuse rulings and still built cars to classes that had broken rule sets. I've written countless letters for changes, and fought hard to help poorly written rules get changed. Because it makes the competition better. That's why I got bored with HPDE events when I started doing them back in the 1990s. I couldn't afford club racing then, and "sort of racing without rules" was utterly pointless and boring to me, so I just gave it up for over a decade. When NASA Time Trial came around, I was all over that. :D

That's me back in 1991 at TWS at a competitive track event, taping up the headlight seams to gain more mph on the main straight
If the Isetta-creation was indeed built for the Locost class (tube framed) in the GRM Challenge, then I apologize. If that was the case then that car was indeed built to the rules, and I commend them on their efforts. I asked a staff member about that car and was told otherwise, but they were apparently mistaken. That's actually kind a relief - it lets me know that there's indeed legitimacy in the GRM Challenge event. :)
If I had a hand in writing the rules there's be pages of things added with minimum weights, wheelbase limits, clearer budget rules, very defined safety budget exceptions, etc. But its GRM's baby, so its all good. We'll adapt to what we've learned, finish the next iteration of our E30 sooner, and do some damn testing before going back, heh.
I've avoided LeMons for the same reasons - the serious teams always get penalized by the "tech judges" and race officials. It can be tiring... but the new Chump Car series is a bit more serious about the competition element, and some of the hard core LeMons teams are jumping to that.
I hope that explains our mentality, a little? It might not jive with all of the other GRM Challenge teams, but I know several folks we talked to there also cared about winning, so we were not completely in left field. When they stop handing out trophies is when the competition element no longer matters, you know? ;)
Thanks for listening.

































Leave a comment: