Truck or SUV for 2500 dollars or less.
Collapse
X
-
I have a fiend with an 01 ranger 3.0 5 speed, lifted 5in pushing 33s on stock gears. Gets the hell beat out of it and runs great with 225k on it.Leave a comment:
-
My brother has a 95 Ranger, 5 speed, and its one of the biggest POS i've ever had the joy of driving. No power in gears 1, 3, 4, 5, and second gear is useless for anything above 17mph.Leave a comment:
-
I have had an 99 cheroke 4.0 auto for 3 years. Took it to florida with me when I lived there for a year. Failed to start on me once in the driveway. It was the cps, easy fix and back on the road. Also has manual shifting 4x4 and permanent locked hubs, so the 4x4 systems never fail.Leave a comment:
-
I have no problem with automatics. It's just if you get an older S-10 with a 2.8 or 4cly. It will be kind of slow...
I got a 96 Ram 2wd ex cab 318 5 speed.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
-
a s10 is more realiable than the ford ranger unless you get the 2.3...which is gutless. i would suggest a cherokee 4.0 for suv, and a 4.3 s10 for a truck.Leave a comment:
-
Yeah I'm not interested in something full sized. A cherokee/4runner would be about as big as I'd want to go.Leave a comment:
-
It was my trail riding/DD for the entire time I owned it. I wish I hadn't sold it :(Leave a comment:
-
-
Sold it to a friend who's wife had a baby because he really needed a car.
What do you think of the older late 80s/early 90s Rangers, Jason?
Wow I like that.My 1991 Jeep cherokee had the 4.0 I6 with 245k on the clock. I paid $700 for it and it was rolled twice, tipped once, submerged up to the windshield once, and slid into trees all within 2 years of me owning it. It never failed to start in the morning, and never failed to get me anywhere I needed/wanted to be. It also looked completely badass when covered in dirt, trees, and my misc road dwelling creatures. Best $700 I ever spent.Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: