Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Global Warming is over.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    which has been statistically zero trend since 1995
    “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
    Sir Winston Churchill

    Comment


      "fact and data driven"

      Comment


        Originally posted by gwb72tii View Post
        which has been statistically zero trend since 1995
        not even the link and chart you *just* posted shows that, even using the cherry picked date of 1995. In fact, for a conspiracy theory website - they even said specifically that it doesn't change the warming trend.
        Build thread

        Bimmerlabs

        Comment


          Originally posted by BraveUlysses View Post
          "fact and data driven"
          A regression analysis starts at the end point and goes backward until it stops being statistically significant
          So no 1995 is not cherry picked, it's where the current flatline ends
          At a time period where co2 has gone up, we were told the arctic would be ice free and the world was headed into oblivion
          And we have all agreed the earth is/has been warming
          We don't agree why
          But apparently man is not the driver
          “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
          Sir Winston Churchill

          Comment


            i think it's time for this forum to stop giving into your desperate pleas for attention

            seek help for your dementia

            Comment


              Anybody reading this check out Google Earth Time-lapse and change your mind? It's actual pics since 1985.

              Explore the dynamics of our changing planet over the past three and a half decades.
              john@m20guru.com
              Links:
              Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

              Comment


                I have a theory that envirosceptics are also probably religious conservatists too. People who will not accept that human-induced global warming is even possible as they religiously believe that mankind can't alter "God's creation". Probably the same people who preach Creationism, claiming that evolution is wrong as it is "just a theory". There might even be a link between Creationists and envirosceptics (Global warming also being "only a theory")... ;-)
                Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

                massivebrakes.com

                http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056





                Comment


                  Originally posted by Massive Lee View Post
                  I have a theory that envirosceptics are also probably religious conservatists too. People who will not accept that human-induced global warming is even possible as they religiously believe that mankind can't alter "God's creation". Probably the same people who preach Creationism, claiming that evolution is wrong as it is "just a theory". There might even be a link between Creationists and envirosceptics (Global warming also being "only a theory")... ;-)
                  You have JUST NOW realized that?
                  Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
                  Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries

                  www.gutenparts.com
                  One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Massive Lee View Post
                    I have a theory that envirosceptics are also probably religious conservatists too. People who will not accept that human-induced global warming is even possible as they religiously believe that mankind can't alter "God's creation". Probably the same people who preach Creationism, claiming that evolution is wrong as it is "just a theory". There might even be a link between Creationists and envirosceptics (Global warming also being "only a theory")... ;-)
                    no, it's the data that disproves the CAGW hypothesis
                    you know, science
                    “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
                    Sir Winston Churchill

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by z31maniac View Post
                      You have JUST NOW realized that?
                      Of course not. But I was delaying sharing my thoughts until I could get more samples to support this theory. And it seems it holds. :devil:
                      Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

                      massivebrakes.com

                      http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056





                      Comment


                        And obviously, religion is about cold hard facts... ;-)

                        Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

                        massivebrakes.com

                        http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056





                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Massive Lee View Post
                          I have a theory that envirosceptics are also probably religious conservatists too. People who will not accept that human-induced global warming is even possible as they religiously believe that mankind can't alter "God's creation". Probably the same people who preach Creationism, claiming that evolution is wrong as it is "just a theory". There might even be a link between Creationists and envirosceptics (Global warming also being "only a theory")... ;-)
                          Is this based on an understanding of world religion?

                          Global warming isn't over until California slides into the ocean.
                          ACS S3 Build / Dinan 5 E34

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by TimeMachinE30 View Post
                            Is this based on an understanding of world religion?
                            Nop. Purely American religious conservatism. Basically the only remaining country where some people still deny that humans have an impact on their environment.

                            Because God.

                            Pretty silly, don't you think?
                            Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

                            massivebrakes.com

                            http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056





                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Massive Lee View Post
                              Nop. Purely American religious conservatism. Basically the only remaining country where some people still deny that humans have an impact on their environment.

                              Because God.

                              Pretty silly, don't you think?
                              So not religion then but people's personal beliefs? Are you claiming certain churches or, say, Baptists or Buddhists believe this way because of teachings from their source texts? Or where are you getting this idea from? And just American?
                              ACS S3 Build / Dinan 5 E34

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Massive Lee View Post
                                I have a theory that envirosceptics are also probably religious conservatists too. People who will not accept that human-induced global warming is even possible as they religiously believe that mankind can't alter "God's creation". Probably the same people who preach Creationism, claiming that evolution is wrong as it is "just a theory". There might even be a link between Creationists and envirosceptics (Global warming also being "only a theory")... ;-)
                                There's plenty of people who don't believe any of it because of the political and policy implications of AGW.

                                However many of them won't really admit that and resort to pretending they understand the science so they can try to undermine support for continued research and deny any effort to create policy that could mitigate or reduce the effects of GW.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X