Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

photoshop request, please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • wycoco
    replied
    I look forward to seeing the kind of designs you come up with for an E30 shirt. Hopefully soon!

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrobot
    replied
    Originally posted by wycoco View Post
    Well anyway, thanks again Kidrobot for fixin up that picture for me. If ever I get the time to put it on a shirt, would you be interested in one? heh
    Neh i print my own clothes.

    thanks though.

    Leave a comment:


  • wycoco
    replied
    Well anyway, thanks again Kidrobot for fixin up that picture for me. If ever I get the time to put it on a shirt, would you be interested in one? heh

    Leave a comment:


  • 8380 Labs
    replied
    Originally posted by kidrobot View Post
    For a guy who quotes things from a text book,
    has 23 posts, and has yet to bless us with his graceful
    art. Don't tell me as an professional artist of 15 years
    what I can and cannot do. I'm probably old enough to
    be your father, and have been creating CG since you
    were in grade school.

    If you had the LEAST idea how they make shirts you'd
    be smart enough to shut up NOW. Two common processes
    are screen print and iron on. If it is ironed, they vector
    it out first. Hence it wouldn't matter pixel content. If it
    is screen printed they just layer color splotches, hence
    pixel content is also irrelevant.

    Before you chime in your two cents and cop an attitude
    with me kid, shut up, sit down, and think over what you
    will say before you say it.
    this is so wrought with irony i cant even begin to know where to start hahahahahaha.

    so because i only got on r3v recently it means i was flopping around in my mothers womb before that? hahahaha please.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jand3rson
    replied
    Alright guys, give it a rest.

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrobot
    replied
    Originally posted by LedJetta View Post
    exerpt ^: "Raster graphics cannot be scaled to a higher resolution without loss of apparent quality."
    For a guy who quotes things from a text book,
    has 23 posts, and has yet to bless us with his graceful
    art. Don't tell me as an professional artist of 15 years
    what I can and cannot do. I'm probably old enough to
    be your father, and have been creating CG since you
    were in grade school.

    If you had the LEAST idea how they make shirts you'd
    be smart enough to shut up NOW. Two common processes
    are screen print and iron on. If it is ironed, they vector
    it out first. Hence it wouldn't matter pixel content. If it
    is screen printed they just layer color splotches, hence
    pixel content is also irrelevant.

    Before you chime in your two cents and cop an attitude
    with me kid, shut up, sit down, and think over what you
    will say before you say it.

    Leave a comment:


  • 8380 Labs
    replied
    well when you make claims like that one, you dont get to sit at the grown up table.

    8-)

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrobot
    replied
    Thanks for treating me like I am art illiterate.
    I'm sure I know what I'm doing by now though.

    Leave a comment:


  • 8380 Labs
    replied
    heres a couple links for you to read up on bitmapped graphics:


    heres another good one:


    exerpt ^: "Raster graphics cannot be scaled to a higher resolution without loss of apparent quality."

    Leave a comment:


  • 8380 Labs
    replied
    Originally posted by kidrobot View Post
    Sorry but I don't buy that......
    its fine to disagree but you havent really given any reasons explaining WHY im wrong, so it doesnt garner you a lot of credibility.

    :roll:

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrobot
    replied
    Originally posted by LedJetta View Post
    unfortunately that wont ever print out nicely because the image you are starting out with is low-res.

    you cant take a bitmapped (pixellated) image like that and make it bigger without it getting fuzzy like that.

    yer only hope is as said before to recreate it in a vector program like illustrator or if there is another version of the image somewhere that is higher quality.
    Sorry but I don't buy that......


    No worries Wycoco! I vectored the BG and just filled the other parts with the
    same colors to edit out pixelation. Doesn't take long to do, and makes it look
    that much better!

    Leave a comment:


  • 8380 Labs
    replied
    unfortunately that wont ever print out nicely because the image you are starting out with is low-res.

    you cant take a bitmapped (pixellated) image like that and make it bigger without it getting fuzzy like that.

    yer only hope is as said before to recreate it in a vector program like illustrator or if there is another version of the image somewhere that is higher quality.

    Leave a comment:


  • wycoco
    replied
    Kidrobot, that's awesome! Thanks very much. I'm sure this will print out nicely.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brant
    replied
    Originally posted by wycoco View Post
    Oh, no. I didn't mean clear as in see through. It's just kind of blurry when I print it out so I was hoping if there was an easier way to get the colors more slid without any of those blur marks.
    OH, I get it...

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrobot
    replied


    That looks like crap now that its offa my computer, I wonder what happened?.
    Last edited by kidrobot; 10-18-2006, 08:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X