any1 using a Z3 steering rack? if so...
Collapse
X
-
Yes this would be good: as I was saying earlier, it would be very useful to know actual rail travel in mm per turn. I was also under the distinct impression that *none* of the E30/E36/Z3 racks were anything but linear, but I won't hold that as gospel. -
Have you actually measured it, or is this based off of feel? My 6/95 M3 rack (realoem shows this as still being the 95 model year part number) doesn't feel progressive. Actually, it feels identical to my 3/97 M3 rack in my track car. They are both ~3.2 turns. I'll have to measure travel per rotation between the two and post my findings to show if either is progressive or linear.Leave a comment:
-
Yes I'm sure. I've confirmed this with the guys at Zionsville and I currently have the 95 M3 rack on our club race car. I also owned a 95 M3 a while back and you can feel the difference between the M3 rack and the Z3 rack.Leave a comment:
-
I'll have to lay off the beans the night before a track day event. :)Leave a comment:
-
they all share the same part number, based on that yes. i have no actual experience to say so however.
anyone knwo what the deal is with servo racks?Leave a comment:
-
I was under the understanding that the Z3 1.9 was tighter than the other Z3's. Are you guys saying all non-M z3's are the same?Leave a comment:
-
-
I have a 95 m3 rack and while I can't comment on the z3 since I've never driven one I find the 95 rack to be very sensitive, not dead in the middle, and if I fart while sitting flat I don't change lanes but if I lift one butt cheek I do, YMMVLeave a comment:
-
Off the top of my head I think the E46 M3 rack is 2.8 or 2.9 turns lock to lock. I'm not sure if it's the same for LHD.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
So the Z3 is specific rate and the M3 is progressive rate?
I like a car that I can change lanes if I sneeze too hard. It sounds like I would like the Z3 rack better.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: