Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

E30 vs E46

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Erick
    replied
    Originally posted by O 16581 72452 5 View Post
    Don't underestimate Acura, they might be FWD, but believe me, they take handling and performance seriously.
    And yet another reason why you have zero credibility.

    FWDs have to share accelerating, breaking and turning all in the same axles. Given the same conditions in power, suspension, etc.... a rwd will always have the handling advantage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave
    replied
    Originally posted by silversleeper View Post
    do you have a 318? because i haven't had the pleasure of "topping out" the car, but i've had the speedo reading ~133 with go left in it. granted mine is a MarkD chipped 325i.
    What JP said. There was more in the car, just not enough pavement at the end of that back straight to allow me to use it. :D

    Leave a comment:


  • O 16581 72452 5
    replied
    Originally posted by robmespeedy View Post
    staggered wheels are a nono for track ????
    It's a matter of taste, some people like the ass to stay planted better, but it tends to make the car plow because you can't step out the rear as easily.

    Leave a comment:


  • robmespeedy
    replied
    staggered wheels are a nono for track ????

    Leave a comment:


  • rob_e30
    replied
    Willow Springs is called the fastest track in the West. Only 9 turnes and 2 pretty good straights. That being said, I've got great footage of my E30 chasing a Ferrari Challenge race car around the track. I close up the gaps in the turns, but he pulls away in the straights.

    The E30 will make you a better driver, the E46 will turn faster lap times.

    Leave a comment:


  • trent
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by 155///MPH View Post
    He was on a racetrack with a straight away and turns at the end not out being a cowboy on public roads.
    hahahaha no shit!

    Leave a comment:


  • 155///MPH
    replied
    He was on a racetrack with a straight away and turns at the end not out being a cowboy on public roads.

    Leave a comment:


  • silversleeper
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveCN View Post
    and I'd top out at around 122-123
    do you have a 318? because i haven't had the pleasure of "topping out" the car, but i've had the speedo reading ~133 with go left in it. granted mine is a MarkD chipped 325i.

    Leave a comment:


  • silversleeper
    replied
    E46 > E30

    In this case only, because E30 is auto.

    Leave a comment:


  • O 16581 72452 5
    replied
    Don't underestimate Acura, they might be FWD, but believe me, they take handling and performance seriously.

    I know this comment will get laughed at by ignorant people, but take an Acura for a spirited drive, namely a performance oriented one like a Type-S or Type-R/GS-R, but even the '90 Integra RS i drove handled very, very well and wasn't completely gutless.

    Leave a comment:


  • 155///MPH
    replied
    If its your first event, both will be equally slow.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rennsport
    replied
    e46... 12 years of development can change alot. why would bmw build a slower car?

    Leave a comment:


  • Eliminator
    replied
    Originally posted by trent View Post
    any body have times at willow? on my old car i was at low 1.40s
    I was doing 1:45's in my AMC Hornet, which I thought was OK considering the poor tires and absolutely horrible brakes that car has. Both BMWs are slower, but will out-handle and out-brake the AMC by an enormous margin. I'm curious how the lap times will compare.

    Leave a comment:


  • trent
    Guest replied
    any body have times at willow? on my old car i was at low 1.40s

    Leave a comment:


  • kencopperwheat
    replied
    Originally posted by erik325i View Post
    I'd take the e46 simply because the e30 has a crapbox tranny.

    -Erik
    and because it's faster, brakes better, and handles better.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X