Charlie,
You have obviously missed the whole point of my posts. It did take a little thought to grasp so I understand.
The scotus ruled that it was a tax ( which it was not, and never argued to be so) and in so doing, the power to vote out those who tax is in the peoples hands. This is how they sold it. The reality is half, and soon to be over half, are not affected by taxes or their increase as they dont pay them. So what do they care if taxes are at 100% they dont pay any. That is the tipping point. They become toataly dependent upon taxes to provide for them. At some point it is not sustainable..... Yes the people have the power to vote out their reps, but once they have become dependent upon the govt to provide for their well being they are powerless. So the logic used by the court is absolutley upside down. In a vacum it may be sound logic, but in reality it is not. Like I originally posted healthcare is the least that this precedent affects.
You have obviously missed the whole point of my posts. It did take a little thought to grasp so I understand.
The scotus ruled that it was a tax ( which it was not, and never argued to be so) and in so doing, the power to vote out those who tax is in the peoples hands. This is how they sold it. The reality is half, and soon to be over half, are not affected by taxes or their increase as they dont pay them. So what do they care if taxes are at 100% they dont pay any. That is the tipping point. They become toataly dependent upon taxes to provide for them. At some point it is not sustainable..... Yes the people have the power to vote out their reps, but once they have become dependent upon the govt to provide for their well being they are powerless. So the logic used by the court is absolutley upside down. In a vacum it may be sound logic, but in reality it is not. Like I originally posted healthcare is the least that this precedent affects.
Comment