Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sachs 765 Pressure Plate on an M20?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sachs 765 Pressure Plate on an M20?

    Hey guys, my clutch started slipping around 25psi on my M20 using a 6 puck clutch, and I need something that will hold the abuse of clutch kicking in 3rd.

    I have read that I can use an M30 or M52/S52 flywheel, an M50 starter, and a Sachs 765 Pressure Plate.

    Can anyone break this down for me and tell me exactly which parts from which models I need? Exactly which starter do I need to use? Which Flywheel because some people say M52 and not M50, or has to be M30/S38. I just need confirmation before I purchase. Thanks in advance!
    - AXIS POWERS - 2JZ E30 Build
    Current Project - 87 325is 2JZ Swapped with M4 DCT

    #2
    -765 pp is m30/S38 flywheel fitment, or that RHD flywheel that's M30 clutch fitment with 24v starter gear. Rated in the sachs pdf for 437ftlb with an organic disc, or 518 ftlb with a sintered plate.

    -792 is S52 flywheel fitment, and rated for 352/organic or 418/sintered. (I've heard of very few people running this one)

    -618 is M20 flywheel fitment, and rated for 333/organic or 392/sintered. (but seems to hold almost double that.)

    I don't think there's a sachs race plate in M52 fitment.
    Originally posted by priapism
    My girl don't know shit, but she bakes a mean cupcake.
    Originally posted by shameson
    Usually it's best not to know how much money you have into your e30

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Northern View Post
      -765 pp is m30/S38 flywheel fitment, or that RHD flywheel that's M30 clutch fitment with 24v starter gear. Rated in the sachs pdf for 437ftlb with an organic disc, or 518 ftlb with a sintered plate.
      Ok so its just that easy then? Get the RHD flywheel, 24v starter, and a 765 and Im good to go? Do you have a link to the different clutch disc that can be used with this combo?
      - AXIS POWERS - 2JZ E30 Build
      Current Project - 87 325is 2JZ Swapped with M4 DCT

      Comment


        #4
        Should be pretty straightforward, I'm just not sure about the disc.

        I think Sachs makes sintered and organic discs with their race series pressure plates, but I don't know how they differ from the normal BMW offerings.

        I'd definitely go for a sprung hub disc. There's really no power loss, just easier on the hardware to have something sprung in there.

        M30/S38 would have 240mm sprung hub discs. Should be easy to find aftermarket organic or sintered clutch discs for it. They would work fine, I'm just not sure if the Sachs Race specific stuff is somehow better.
        Originally posted by priapism
        My girl don't know shit, but she bakes a mean cupcake.
        Originally posted by shameson
        Usually it's best not to know how much money you have into your e30

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Northern View Post
          Should be pretty straightforward, I'm just not sure about the disc.

          I think Sachs makes sintered and organic discs with their race series pressure plates, but I don't know how they differ from the normal BMW offerings.

          I'd definitely go for a sprung hub disc. There's really no power loss, just easier on the hardware to have something sprung in there.

          M30/S38 would have 240mm sprung hub discs. Should be easy to find aftermarket organic or sintered clutch discs for it. They would work fine, I'm just not sure if the Sachs Race specific stuff is somehow better.
          I would actually choose the S52 setup; using 2x of them in 36m/30; both with twincams

          1. aftermarket s52 flywheels are easily avail; to attach to m20 just run m50 starter.

          2. pressure plate is lighter than s38 unit; if needed aftermarket clutches are many to choose from.

          3. sprung hub is not needed with s52 clutch; I have ran both sachs s52 pressure plate with a sprung friction disc and sachs s52 clutch set with un-sprung friction disc; both are mild enough to drive around in san francisco.

          4. As far as power holding is concerned; the s52 OEM sachs clutch/unsprung friction disc is easy to drive for all drivers and is good enough to run for the 25hrs of thunderhill + s54 @ 310rwhp; locally proven in endurance use.
          Last edited by Wanganstyle; 10-22-2017, 10:01 AM.
          OBD1 M54/M52TU swap as a M50b25

          Z4 non powered steering rack fits e30



          Euro e46 2005/6 320d 6mt gearbox into E30 with M20 hardy and beck 1985 327s engine

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Wanganstyle View Post
            3. sprung hub is not needed with s52 clutch; I have ran both sachs s52 pressure plate with a sprung friction disc and sachs s52 clutch set with un-sprung friction disc; both are mild enough to drive around in san francisco.
            I'm assuming he's running a single mass flywheel with any of these setups, hence the sprung disc recommendation.
            Originally posted by priapism
            My girl don't know shit, but she bakes a mean cupcake.
            Originally posted by shameson
            Usually it's best not to know how much money you have into your e30

            Comment


              #7
              Sachs 765 Pressure Plate on an M20?

              Originally posted by Northern View Post
              I'm assuming he's running a single mass flywheel with any of these setups, hence the sprung disc recommendation.


              Like I stated:

              S52 Oem presssure plate and
              UNsprung s52 friction disc
              + single mass flywheel

              In BOTH of my cars (e30 m54/ e36m) is ok to daily drive in San Francisco.


              The difference between a spring loaded friction disc and non with the same single mass flywheel and s52 pressure plate is almost moot.
              OBD1 M54/M52TU swap as a M50b25

              Z4 non powered steering rack fits e30



              Euro e46 2005/6 320d 6mt gearbox into E30 with M20 hardy and beck 1985 327s engine

              Comment


                #8
                Sachs 765 Pressure Plate on an M20?

                Please delete
                OBD1 M54/M52TU swap as a M50b25

                Z4 non powered steering rack fits e30



                Euro e46 2005/6 320d 6mt gearbox into E30 with M20 hardy and beck 1985 327s engine

                Comment


                  #9
                  A sprung clutch disc or flywheel has nothing to do with holding power, so there's zero reason to pair the two solid parts together...

                  The crankshaft accelerates in an oscillation from the 3 combustion events per revolution, and the springs just damp these acceleration events.

                  Removing the sprung disc/flywheel just causes them to be passed on through the transmission. Between lash and the guibo they probably disappear quickly, but considering the springs in the discs fail so rarely, there's no advantage gained by running a solid disc, only potential for ever-so-slightly more wear on the clutch and transmission.


                  I understand that you'll likely disagree with this, and that's fine.
                  Last edited by Northern; 07-23-2019, 06:35 AM.
                  Originally posted by priapism
                  My girl don't know shit, but she bakes a mean cupcake.
                  Originally posted by shameson
                  Usually it's best not to know how much money you have into your e30

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Wanganstyle View Post
                    Like I stated:

                    S52 Oem presssure plate and
                    UNsprung s52 friction disc
                    + single mass flywheel

                    In BOTH of my cars (e30 m54/ e36m) is ok to daily drive in San Francisco.


                    The difference between a spring loaded friction disc and non with the same single mass flywheel and s52 pressure plate is almost moot.
                    I can agree this works, and works fine. But as Northern said, you really want the dampening somewhere IMO. It's splitting hairs, but don't you agree your transmission bearings will be a little happier with dampening?

                    Some people don't care about idle clutch rattle #becauseracecar, and some people will cry at a squeak from a trailing arm bushing - so some of this topic is subjective YMMV.
                    john@m20guru.com
                    Links:
                    Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Bearings give zero fucks.

                      Also:

                      Damped:


                      Dampened:

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
                        I can agree this works, and works fine. But as Northern said, you really want the dampening somewhere IMO. It's splitting hairs, but don't you agree your transmission bearings will be a little happier with dampening?

                        Some people don't care about idle clutch rattle #becauseracecar, and some people will cry at a squeak from a trailing arm bushing - so some of this topic is subjective YMMV.

                        the transmission cares a lot more about the fact that its original dual mass flywheel was replaced by a solid piece; the undamped friction disc is native to the transmission.

                        both e36m and e30 are dohc 24v single vanos; none of these had a native single mass

                        but in reality it does not care at all. 286k miles original vin matching transmission to engine and body
                        OBD1 M54/M52TU swap as a M50b25

                        Z4 non powered steering rack fits e30



                        Euro e46 2005/6 320d 6mt gearbox into E30 with M20 hardy and beck 1985 327s engine

                        Comment


                          #13
                          The ONLY function of the sprung hub disk is to reduce gear rattle in the transmission.

                          It does *NOT* affect torque transients through the driveline in any way.

                          The springs bottom out with comparatively little torque applied to the disk. A sprung hub disk doesn't cushion anything in any meaningful way.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X