From what I've read, the 737 Max is still a "hydraulically-assisted" cable flight controls airplane. No fly by wire.
What they've been talking about, and with this bulletin, is the airspeed indicators and angle of attack sensors somehow think the thing is stalling, and the computer forces the nose down even if flying manually. If the sensors are messed up, fooling the computer, the pilot is fighting a plane that wants to dive.
What the "standard procedure" is to overcome that, I have no idea. It doesn't seem like there's time to be browsing through the manual for Section 378 Paragraph 5B.
The thing hit the water going fast. Engines still spinning, blades all mashed, fuselage "fractured." Landing gear and the engines are the biggest pieces.
What they've been talking about, and with this bulletin, is the airspeed indicators and angle of attack sensors somehow think the thing is stalling, and the computer forces the nose down even if flying manually. If the sensors are messed up, fooling the computer, the pilot is fighting a plane that wants to dive.
What the "standard procedure" is to overcome that, I have no idea. It doesn't seem like there's time to be browsing through the manual for Section 378 Paragraph 5B.
The thing hit the water going fast. Engines still spinning, blades all mashed, fuselage "fractured." Landing gear and the engines are the biggest pieces.
Comment