I frequently read the reason for the 2A, is because of protection against tyranny of the gov't.
Does anyone honestly believe if the gov't turned it's guns on the people, middle-aged folks with a glock and an AR would do anything? (Hint, they wouldn't)
I then frequently get the response that "The military would never turn against the people."
Does anyone see the contradiction here?
Does anyone honestly believe if the gov't turned it's guns on the people, middle-aged folks with a glock and an AR would do anything? (Hint, they wouldn't)
I then frequently get the response that "The military would never turn against the people."
Does anyone see the contradiction here?
Comment