Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

5 lug vs 4 lug

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Aptyp View Post
    It has nothing to do with strut housings, it's in the camber plate...


    When you look at e30 vs e36 suspensions, strut towers of e36 are more upright, and that's what changes caster between two generations. If you have enough caster adjustment in camber plates, you don't even need e36 m3 control arms or spindles. I like their solution though. If you redrill your shock towers more to the front, you'd have exactly the same effect.


    PS, I do like their built housings. GC machined housings are much better than stock stamped out ones.
    Right, but since the E30 housings are angled, changing the length of the GC "e36" housings changes the geometry to gain more caster.

    About the camber plates.....The E36 M3 5 lug swap I have seen used ground control plates maxed for both camber and caster but was barely able to get back to STOCK e30 settings for caster and camber. It was impossible on that swap to get any additional caster, nor was it possible to get much more camber. Setting the plates to "normal" gave positive camber and craptacular caster. This is why I'm very skeptical of this swap....
    2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
    95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
    98 M3/4/5 (stock)

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Aptyp View Post
      It has nothing to do with strut housings, it's in the camber plate...
      I'm going off what Jay at Ground Control told me about custom building the correct geometry into the strut.

      I'm not going to continue to argue with you about this.
      Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
      Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries

      www.gutenparts.com
      One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!

      Comment


        #63
        Height of of the housings changes nothing... They're COILOVERS. Height adjusts, so that comment is somewhat retarded (unless you meant something different)...

        The only thing I could think of, they have mounting points welded at a slight angle to the strut tube, but they took pics well enough not to be able to see it. I can see how that could aid caster a little bit, but would put more stress on outer balljoint.

        I still haven't put e36 m3 control arms on, and only rub I get is on the inside rail at full lock and I run a slightly oversize diameter tire. With steering wheel turn 1/8 of the way, wheels are in prefect position on both sides for you not to be able to tell that caster is off. This swap has been done by way too many people, and most of the time you can't even tell. It's already been shown by Daniel that you can run ET 20 wheels, so possibilities of stock wheels are endless as well.

        Seems like the only skepticism you have is cosmetics, though...

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by Aptyp View Post
          The only thing I could think of, they have mounting points welded at a slight angle to the strut tube, but they took pics well enough not to be able to see it. I can see how that could aid caster a little bit, but would put more stress on outer balljoint.
          I believe that is exactly what he told me on the phone, but I won't swear to it. He did tell me you still have to use OEM M3 CABs (or poly/delrin offset) AND 96+ M3 Control Arms.
          Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
          Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries

          www.gutenparts.com
          One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Aptyp View Post
            Height of of the housings changes nothing... They're COILOVERS. Height adjusts, so that comment is somewhat retarded (unless you meant something different)...

            The only thing I could think of, they have mounting points welded at a slight angle to the strut tube, but they took pics well enough not to be able to see it. I can see how that could aid caster a little bit, but would put more stress on outer balljoint.

            I still haven't put e36 m3 control arms on, and only rub I get is on the inside rail at full lock and I run a slightly oversize diameter tire. With steering wheel turn 1/8 of the way, wheels are in prefect position on both sides for you not to be able to tell that caster is off. This swap has been done by way too many people, and most of the time you can't even tell. It's already been shown by Daniel that you can run ET 20 wheels, so possibilities of stock wheels are endless as well.

            Seems like the only skepticism you have is cosmetics, though...
            so you can't *tell* that your caster is off? that means it is, or isn't off? have you even put this thing on an alignment rack? put up some numbers or shut it. none of this "well you can't tell, so it's okay"

            rubbing the insides at full lock is pretty shitty.
            Build thread

            Bimmerlabs

            Comment


              #66
              That means that most people whine at the cosmetic difference. If you set caster with the e36 swap to e30 specs, you'll be rubbing pretty bad and it will LOOK like caster is off. That's the whole point of me saying that e36 towers are moved forward by about 2", which makes them more vertical than e30's, and that makes the difference in caster when you rotate entire assembly over outer balljoint. So you're trying to set your caster between e30 and e36 specs.


              I have e36 rack, and even e36s come with spacer-locks for tie-rods when use 225s in the front... Besides, not very often I go lock to lock. Goodyear aligned my car, and car runs perfect, 15k miles this summer and tires are perfect all around.


              One of the wonderful things about doing this swap, you also learn a lot about your suspension, alignments, and how it works. A lot of people could benefit from this.

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Aptyp View Post
                That means that most people whine at the cosmetic difference. If you set caster with the e36 swap to e30 specs, you'll be rubbing pretty bad and it will LOOK like caster is off. That's the whole point of me saying that e36 towers are moved forward by about 2", which makes them more vertical than e30's, and that makes the difference in caster when you rotate entire assembly over outer balljoint. So you're trying to set your caster between e30 and e36 specs.


                I have e36 rack, and even e36s come with spacer-locks for tie-rods when use 225s in the front... Besides, not very often I go lock to lock. Goodyear aligned my car, and car runs perfect, 15k miles this summer and tires are perfect all around.


                One of the wonderful things about doing this swap, you also learn a lot about your suspension, alignments, and how it works. A lot of people could benefit from this.
                The cosmetics are completely unimportant for me; I could give two shits how it looks. I want to fit big brakes under big lightweight track wheels, and this is the most affordable option if I want a wheel larger than 17x8.

                So, like nando said: numbers please. If the caster is less than an stock e30.....not so good.
                2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
                95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
                98 M3/4/5 (stock)

                Comment


                  #68
                  i'm getting an alignment soon after i get my new tires mounted, so i'll see if i can get a printout from the shop that does it showing the caster numbers.

                  and for the record, when i got an alignment last year and they adjusted the camber to stock e30 camber, the IE camber plates weren't adjusted all the way in just to achieve that. they sit around the middle, or maybe slightly in. basically there is plenty of room left to go if you wanted mad negative camber.
                  http://instagram.com/dslovn.drives

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Bimmerman325i View Post
                    The cosmetics are completely unimportant for me; I could give two shits how it looks. I want to fit big brakes under big lightweight track wheels, and this is the most affordable option if I want a wheel larger than 17x8.

                    So, like nando said: numbers please. If the caster is less than an stock e30.....not so good.
                    Gotcha, I don't remember if I ever got a print out, but if I did, it's in my glove box. I'll search tomorrow for you.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Sorry to bump an old thread but did anyone get actual numbers of their 5lug alignment?

                      -Cam
                      Cam .W '91 325is

                      Spaz's 1991 Alpine White???? S52 Build Thread...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X