Instead of tapping the S52 head for coolant temp sensor...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • equate975
    replied
    Is this what you guys were talking about?



    I was thinking of making something similar to that a while ago. Like a "Y Adapter" of sorts to plug both temp sensors into the 1 hole, but I figured there wouldnt be good enough coolant flow to get an accurate reading... Maybe there would be with that if you are auctually heating the TB.

    Leave a comment:


  • equate975
    replied
    Sweet, I think im going to end up doing this. Right now I just have my vod gauge sensor by the water pump, ill see if I can make it fit in there.

    FWIW I bypassed my TB heater and I am in MN... Then again this car dosnt see winter :-P

    Leave a comment:


  • ian332isport
    replied
    Originally posted by Jason89i
    nope. different resistance on e30 vs. e36 temp guage sensors.

    jason
    I guess that makes it a pretty worthless piece of wiring then

    Leave a comment:


  • matt
    replied
    Zionsville has a thingie that goes in the line to the TB. lets you put an e30 sensor in there for the gauge. seems to work great.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jason89i
    replied
    Originally posted by ian332isport
    Does that take into account the different resistance value of the E36 sensor though ?

    Ian.
    nope. different resistance on e30 vs. e36 temp guage sensors.

    jason

    Leave a comment:


  • ian332isport
    replied
    Originally posted by LINUS
    Or else cheat completely and get a Zionsville/Turner harness adapter. At least you still heat the t-body that way.
    Does that take into account the different resistance value of the E36 sensor though ?

    Ian.

    Leave a comment:


  • aeryk7
    replied
    Turner says that most m52 s52 only have two hole instead of three in which case the pictures confused me . Im good now.

    Leave a comment:


  • aeryk7
    replied
    Just a little curious how come you couldnt just replace the doulble switched sensor for the obd1 sensor and uncrew the plug and put the sender in its place? Arent these heads cast the same ?

    I am sorry if i am ignorant to this cause but arent all these sensor holes identical to either head cant you just swap the obd1 sensors for the the obd2 and call it a day.

    **********OBD1************




    **********OBD2*************

    Last edited by aeryk7; 10-18-2006, 10:44 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • LINUS
    replied
    Originally posted by trent
    Just tap the damn head. What is the big deal? Takes 5 min.

    +1

    Makes it a factory setup.

    Or else cheat completely and get a Zionsville/Turner harness adapter. At least you still heat the t-body that way.

    Leave a comment:


  • aeryk7
    replied
    Originally posted by trent
    Most people realise this is a problem before they install the motor. I do agree, much faster when the motor is out and/or just a long block.

    I was thinking about 3.2 in e36 m3 and people converting to obd1 not really thinking about e30 guys having to pretty much go obd1 anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • matt
    replied
    Using a dye on the temp sensor is just going to leave you with a different colored sensor. You'd probably rather use a die to change the threads on it.

    I'll second the suggestion to not bypass the throttle heater. It helps the motor warm up faster, and prevents the intake charge from freezing in the throttlebody under the proper conditions.

    Leave a comment:


  • trent
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by aeryk7
    Using a dye on the original sensor is more time efficient , you rethread the original sensor and it screws into a hole already tapped in the head. I could seriously do this with my current setup in 5 minutes had i had the dye in hand. If the engine is cool i would even be able to put the sensor in with out barely losing any coolant unlike if you were to tap the head and drain all existing coolant , metal shavings everywhere,cleaning them up ,etc. Not to mention in order to tap the head you would have to remove the intake manifold.
    Most people realise this is a problem before they install the motor. I do agree, much faster when the motor is out and/or just a long block.

    Leave a comment:


  • aeryk7
    replied
    Originally posted by trent
    Just tap the damn head. What is the big deal? Takes 5 min.
    Using a dye on the original sensor is more time efficient , you rethread the original sensor and it screws into a hole already tapped in the head. I could seriously do this with my current setup in 5 minutes had i had the dye in hand. If the engine is cool i would even be able to put the sensor in with out barely losing any coolant unlike if you were to tap the head and drain all existing coolant , metal shavings everywhere,cleaning them up ,etc. Not to mention in order to tap the head you would have to remove the intake manifold.

    Leave a comment:


  • trent
    Guest replied
    Just tap the damn head. What is the big deal? Takes 5 min.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jason89i
    replied
    Originally posted by KangamangusDriver
    He told me that you can remove the threaded fitting for the coolant hose that cools the the throttle body(one we usually bypass). ........what do you guys think?

    bypassing the tbody coolant tube is not a good idea for cars in the northern climate.

    if you do not heat the tbody in the winter, you will get frost / ice buildup. humidity will stick to the butterfly. engine will choke, plate will stick, car will be posessed......they you let it sit, ice thaws, water drians into the inake, now the car runs normal.

    cheers, jason

    Leave a comment:

Working...