Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

e30 m52 s14 s50 weight comparisons

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by static View Post
    I am kind of tired of my s50e30's heavy nose understeer at autox's and track

    Learn how to rotate, trailbraking is your friend. Plus, dont you 24v guys have enough power to throttlesteer a bit now?

    As time went on, the factory developed the car each year, making it faster, more comfortable, and capable of handling at higher speeds.
    You don’t want this. You want the trickiest, most dangerous, oldest model you can find. Only then can you prove to the world that you’re a man.

    Comment


      #17
      Don't blame the weight distribution for lacking the ability or knowlege to set the car's suspension up properly.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by madjurgen View Post
        Learn how to rotate, trailbraking is your friend. Plus, dont you 24v guys have enough power to throttlesteer a bit now?
        who's talking about power-oversteer? I do that easily, i am talking about neutrality of the car. Trailbrake ends up plowing with one front wheel locked up.
        Stiffening up rear bar is going backwards, as it just reduces the rear grip as opposed to increasing the overal grip. Funny thing is even 3deg neg camber in the front doesn't really help - just plows like a pig

        as for skills, i had a local autox guru running my car and it plowed in his hands too, so it's not my lacking skills.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by static View Post
          as for skills, i had a local autox guru running my car and it plowed in his hands too, so it's not my lacking skills.
          I didn't mean driving skills.

          Adding adjustability is step one, but then you need to adjust it properly.

          Spring rates, shock damping, sway bars, camber and toe... all of these will change the balance and grip of the car.

          Obviously the weight distribution has something to do with it also, but it is not the handicap you make it out to be.

          Comment


            #20
            so is it actually worth the s50 swap? i am thinking going s52 obd1 and pissing off the m40 in there atm. i dont wont to loss the handling it has now

            Comment


              #21
              DO it.
              My 2.9L Build!

              Originally posted by Ernest Hemingway
              There are only three sports: bullfighting, motor racing, and mountaineering; all the rest are merely games.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by static View Post
                Trailbrake ends up plowing with one front wheel locked up...........just plows like a pig.......Stiffening up rear bar is going backwards, as it just reduces the rear grip as opposed to increasing the overal grip. .
                um, think about what you just said.
                problem: car pushes, rear grip is greater than front grip.
                recomendation: stiffen up rear bar.
                your response: stiffening up the rear bar reduces rear grip.

                think about it, less overall grip in rear, more overall grip on the front....less understeer.

                just about any e30 can be set to neutral with some good springs, shocks and adjustible bars.

                of course thing can get complex real quick. if you feel your in the deep end, you could always find someone that builds roadrace cars to dial it in.

                cheers, jason.
                Last edited by Jason89i; 06-30-2007, 08:10 AM.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by static View Post
                  http://www.bimmerforums.com/engine_faq/

                  m42 is 34lb lighter than s14

                  US m50/s50 is around 300lb and alu blocked is 260lb

                  one more thing you guys have to keep in mind is that straight6 stick out past the front axel, which is detrimental for handling.

                  I am kind of tired of my s50e30's heavy nose understeer at autox's and track, so i've been toying with idea of a turbo'ed M42 instead.
                  Every E30 understeers. You just need to dial in some more right foot.


                  Keep it slideways!!

                  Comment


                    #24
                    My car is about as neutral as you can get, under or oversteer can be dialed in around almost any corner at just about any speed. Adding camber plates up front and about 3.5 degrees negative camber was a huge help to both turn-in and front end grip.

                    GC 350f/475r, Koni SAs, M3 CABs, stock sways, 205/50-15 RS-2's. The front toe is aligned to m3 specs.
                    '91 318is
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                      #25
                      haha ok ill do it then im already starting to upset the local drift community with her in this shitty standard

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by Axxe View Post
                        Every E30 understeers.
                        I hope that comment is a joke.

                        I never had understeer without or with my S50. Even when I was still rocking 195's.

                        You you want to feel a lot of understeer go drive an E36 M3.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Axxe View Post
                          Every E30 understeers. You just need to dial in some more right foot.
                          ehhhh. i wouldn't go that far. spring rates and camber i know can go very far in changing how a car handles. unless e30s are fundamentally different from a normal vehicle

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Brew View Post
                            My car is about as neutral as you can get, under or oversteer can be dialed in around almost any corner at just about any speed. Adding camber plates up front and about 3.5 degrees negative camber was a huge help to both turn-in and front end grip.

                            GC 350f/475r, Koni SAs, M3 CABs, stock sways, 205/50-15 RS-2's. The front toe is aligned to m3 specs.
                            i am running same shocks, CABs, Eibach sways and same tires (even same width) albeit with H&R sports (soft i know) and dialing in camber to 3 neg almost changed nothing at an autox

                            how much harsher do you think adding same weight GC's would be on my daily? (i have full soft front and half turn from full soft at rear on the konis, did you have to stiffen them up with these weight springs?)

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Its not that stiff at all. I've been daily driving on these rates for the past 3 years. I think my Koni's are set to about a 1/4 turn from full stiff front and rear, but I haven't messed around with them much at all because the car handles so well.

                              The additional camber was very noticeable to me, and it stopped me from overheating the outer edge of my tires.
                              '91 318is
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by static View Post
                                i have full soft front and half turn from full soft at rear on the konis

                                Maybe you don't have enoguh dampening up front. Turn the shocks to a stiffer setting, and play with that.
                                '89 325i track sloot
                                '01 530i daily

                                -Enginerd

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X