Miller maf

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kamotors
    replied
    in about 2-3 weeks I'm going to film some more 0-60 runs. The differences this time will be headers, magnaflow muffler, miller maf, much bigger K&N air filter, and a 4.27 z3 torsen diff.
    I'll compare it to my old 0-60 videos and see where things have improved. Really hoping for a solid sub 7 second time (average 0-60 with old setup was 7.2-7.3)but I doubt thats going to happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    the AFM is not a MAF ;)

    Leave a comment:


  • allwheeldrive
    replied
    I'm gonna order one up once i get my tax refund back. I'll do some gas mileage comparisons and post them up. I'm excited to get rid of the old style MAF.

    Leave a comment:


  • blocke
    replied
    I've has mine installed for about 2 months now. It is def. smoother, both in terms of idle and acceleration. Product quality is top notch. My only complaint is that the chip included with the MAF does lower the cars idle a bit (to around 600rpm), which is only a problem now in the winter months, as it takes longer to warm the car up. I also suspect that I may have a bad temp sensor adding to the mix...so who can be sure.
    I am very pleased with the MAF conversion, makes my 250k M20 run smooth like new!

    Leave a comment:


  • Adrian_Visser
    replied
    Nice m3 Todd Black are you a Vancouver local? not too many e30 m3's up here especially nice ones like that

    Leave a comment:


  • bmwstephen
    replied
    Originally posted by Detlman
    smog? hahaha I doubt they would know the difference
    then this truly is the holy grail of bolt on mods for the m20 LOL thanks for ur input man

    Also, where does your idle sit now on the rpm range? Supposedly this makes the car idle smoother
    Last edited by bmwstephen; 02-08-2010, 02:26 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Detlman
    replied
    smog? hahaha I doubt they would know the difference

    Leave a comment:


  • bmwstephen
    replied
    so CA owners? any trouble with smog?

    Leave a comment:


  • M-technik-3
    replied
    My quote was meant for Todd Black 88 as the Miller seemed to drop development on the MAF for the S14 for sometime due to AFR numbers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Detlman
    replied
    for me I would say 100% positive. car runs smoother and is more responsive. I have no before or after numbers only perception/but dyno :)

    Leave a comment:


  • M-technik-3
    replied
    Originally posted by Todd Black 88
    My car at Miller with thier new Gen3 4" S14 maf being installed and dyno'd.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX3hN-JE51E
    Slightly lower than stock numbers. What was before this was installed? Is there a before and after or just after?

    Leave a comment:


  • bmwstephen
    replied
    and to sum it up.. based on everyone's experience, there is absolutley no compromise? I just want to old engine to run smoother. A performance increase ia bump.

    Leave a comment:


  • Detlman
    replied
    I honestly cant give a # but it does much better. I am always pushing mine and it gets 17+ on the streets shifting at 5-6K all the time. I love it, I can put a tank of gas and beat the crap out of it to work and back for 3 weeks...hahahaha

    Leave a comment:


  • bmwstephen
    replied
    any feedback on how it effects gas mileage yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • blocke
    replied
    Where is the link to this combo everyone is talking about. I checked the miller site, but it just brings me back to a list of Miller dealers.
    Anyone have the link?

    Leave a comment:

Working...