'84 325e 2.7i swap questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Varinn
    replied
    Decisions have been made! After difficulty dealing with the source of my potential m20b25 motor I managed to find a basically free 1987 325i that I intend to pillage all parts from. The car has a blown head, so I'll be using it to grab every other piece of the puzzle. Intake, exhaust, electronics, water pump etc, rad, etc.

    The head is coming from my friends e21 323i and will be having a SLIGHT shave before install to give it a tiny nudge up in compression. The head is a low mileage (~150KM) unit and well maintained with frequent valve adjustments. I may have a regrind done, but I doubt I will get that far into it. I understand the 731 head is better and the 885 is best with custom pistons but that is far over my budget. As it stands, with all fresh gaskets, fluids, and timing belt I will be sitting at $300 for the conversion not including selling my current engine parts (including an 027 DME w/Mark D chip)

    I'm in the process of reading through this thread


    I have two new questions:
    1: What is the difference between the flywheels on an '84 eta and an '87 i?
    2: What are my limits for removing material from the head before I risk running into valve-piston clearance issues?

    Leave a comment:


  • bmwstudent
    replied
    Forced firebird is no dummy, i would not take what he says as "a load of crap."

    Leave a comment:


  • Varinn
    replied
    Originally posted by ForcedFirebird
    Early block and rotating assembly.



    .050" gasket gives almost 8.7:1, I never broke out the buret to CC the chambers after the head got shaved, but the indication dots on the bottom of the head are almost gone. Guess one could measure the head thickness and calc it close. My cam timing is probably pretty retarded at this point though lol. The dyno numbers were taken with an un-shaved head and stock gasket.
    I've heard rumors of valve-piston clearance issues with too much head shave or gasket thinning, did you see any of these issues? Also, I guess you're running an adjustable cam pulley?
    Last edited by Varinn; 10-10-2011, 02:03 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied
    Originally posted by Varinn
    Hmmm, is that a super eta block or an early eta?? I hear so many "dude the car will barely run" claims that it would be nice to know it will work using an early eta with an 885 head. I have a choice right now between a 200 casting 323i head and an 885. The 323i setup would cost roughly $100 more than using the 885. I'm going to be picking up a complete 87 325i motor as a starting point
    Early block and rotating assembly.

    Originally posted by 2man
    ive also wondered this myself. the small drop in the CR can be easily offset by shaving the head. a half point in CR is a normal shave on a head.
    .050" gasket gives almost 8.7:1, I never broke out the buret to CC the chambers after the head got shaved, but the indication dots on the bottom of the head are almost gone. Guess one could measure the head thickness and calc it close. My cam timing is probably pretty retarded at this point though lol. The dyno numbers were taken with an un-shaved head and stock gasket.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2mAn
    replied
    Originally posted by Varinn
    Also, what possible gains in CR can be had by shaving the head or using a thinner HG?
    ive also wondered this myself. the small drop in the CR can be easily offset by shaving the head. a half point in CR is a normal shave on a head.

    Leave a comment:


  • Varinn
    replied
    Also, what possible gains in CR can be had by shaving the head or using a thinner HG?

    Leave a comment:


  • Varinn
    replied
    Originally posted by ForcedFirebird
    My 885/eta combination made more power and TQ at the wheels than a friend's stock i with similar mileage, even though it had the single eta exhaust. You lose .4:1 compression but gain displacement so it's almost a wash.
    Hmmm, is that a super eta block or an early eta?? I hear so many "dude the car will barely run" claims that it would be nice to know it will work using an early eta with an 885 head. I have a choice right now between a 200 casting 323i head and an 885. The 323i setup would cost roughly $100 more than using the 885. I'm going to be picking up a complete 87 325i motor as a starting point

    Leave a comment:


  • The Humjet
    replied
    I love how people say its drop in cr is so bad that power levals are the same between a 327i and 325i. What a load of crap.

    Leave a comment:


  • ForcedFirebird
    replied
    Originally posted by The Humjet
    You would get more power. But it will be still fairly restricted, but more can be made.
    Cast 200 head is what's found on e30 325e and e21 323i.
    Cast 731 is what was found on e30 320i and 323i. They had a similar casting to the 200 but with larger ports.
    Cast 885 is found on e30 325i they hard a further increase in port size and larger valves. But a drop in the compression ratio. Good for turbos but not so much for NA.
    There has always been a debate whether to go for the 731 head or 885 head. But there is only a few HP in between them at the end of the day.
    My 885/eta combination made more power and TQ at the wheels than a friend's stock i with similar mileage, even though it had the single eta exhaust. You lose .4:1 compression but gain displacement so it's almost a wash.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Humjet
    replied
    Fair enough but since you have an eta block already you might as well attach it to the m20b25 while its on the stand. Because you're gonna have to open the motor to replace stuff like gaskets, timing belt and water pump anyway. That's just my 2c.
    Mark D probably makes one of the best chips out there, I bought a W.A.R chip and Maf only cause I found it cheap and I could ditch the AFM.
    I wouldnt bother with a cam they cost too much for the gains they give but they do sound good when at idle. Unless your running high comp then it won't do much to the performance it'll just shift the powerband upwards.
    Last edited by The Humjet; 09-24-2011, 10:45 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Varinn
    replied
    I was thinking more along the lines of a straight swap to the m20b25, no other mods save for a chip and possibly exhaust seeing as it wont come with the motor anyways.

    EDIT: i may consider using a MarkD chip tuned for 19# injectors as well as throwing in a cam while the motor's on a stand. What sort of benefits would this offer?
    Last edited by Varinn; 09-24-2011, 07:29 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Humjet
    replied
    I say why not that's exactly what I'm doing I found a cheap m20b25 out of an e34 525i and all I did was swap the 2.5 block to the 2.7 block out of my 86 eta. Kept the 2.5 harness sensors and cyl head.
    That way you get the torque from the eta and the power from the 2.5 which is good for autocrossing.
    Most guys recommend the 3.73 diff.

    Leave a comment:


  • Varinn
    replied
    Random update, I've picked up a 3.25LSD to run in the ETA for the time being. I went down to my buddies today to order up new bushings, gaskets, oil etc. While I was at the shop today I was offered a complete m20b25 with a rebuilt head out of a rear ended car for $200, the engine runs great. Included with the deal would be all components of the motor and harnesses/ecu. It's a known car to my friends, and verified to be well maintained.

    Engine is an out of an 87 325ic

    Does this sound like a reasonable deal? In terms of effort it is vastly less work than doing the 327i conversion, a straight swap could be done in a day. How does the 325i compare to the 325e as a daily driver/autocross car, and I've seen most recommendations be that it is best suited with a 3.93 or 4.10 differential. Is the torque curve so far different that it makes that much difference?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Humjet
    replied
    You would have to get a chip. You could get an Alpina c27 chip from eBay for cheap. You may also need larger 19# injectors.
    I'm using a miller Maf and w.a.r chip on my conversion.
    The eta exhaust would also be restrictive. I'm gonna be running a set of headers into y pipe turning into a single 2.5" system with hi flow cat, a muffler and resonator. I'd put that last on your list just get it running right first and then start doing performance bits later.

    Leave a comment:


  • Varinn
    replied
    Will the standard 173(?) dme run all forms of the conversion? I'd assume with such a large change in flow rates and the obious 2L displacement change between the 2.5 and 2.7's that major gains can be had with a custom tune.

    I'm also curious if the 325i exhaust is needed, with the 325e having a single pipe stock, the step to the twin might gain large amounts by evening out the intake and exhaust flow

    Leave a comment:

Working...