We're putting together a refreshed M90 out of my old 635csi for our lemons car. Last night, the pistons went in and we had to work through some issues. I'm looking for maybe some confirmation/denial of our conclusions from what we found.
The crank got checked out at a machine shop and all the rod journals are round and in spec, so we got standard, non-oversize rod bearings. 4/6 rods plastigauged dead in the middle of spec (.025mm - .055mm). One other one was loose, and I went about replacing the rod with a used one out of a B35, and found something interesting!
The M90 rods have the bearing shell notches on opposing sides, judging by residual dirt on various rod surfaces. The B35 rod I was replacing it with has them on the same side, and this was consistent with all the other B35 rods I have lying around.
- Which is more correct?
- Is there a production difference or any specific reason this change would've been made?
- Should the M90 rods be installed only in the direction that buts up the bearing shells against the notches to prevent them from spinning?
- Does direction matter for B35 rods?
The other not-good one was way too tight (like, motor wouldn't spin with it torqued down), and the cause was pretty confusing. Despite thorough, repeated cleaning, the bearing shell was too long, and sat proud of the split between rod and cap wherever it was inserted. I'd assume there is some decent quality control on bearing shells - is this not completely unheard of? We replaced that shell with the best used one I had lying around and it sat flat and plastigauged perfectly, but I'm concerned about mixing new and old shells.
Anyway, advice on what to look out for in assembly is appreciated. I've done my share of heads, but not as experienced with block assembly and looking to learn more. Sadly I haven't been able to find great, in-depth documentation on things like this.
The crank got checked out at a machine shop and all the rod journals are round and in spec, so we got standard, non-oversize rod bearings. 4/6 rods plastigauged dead in the middle of spec (.025mm - .055mm). One other one was loose, and I went about replacing the rod with a used one out of a B35, and found something interesting!
The M90 rods have the bearing shell notches on opposing sides, judging by residual dirt on various rod surfaces. The B35 rod I was replacing it with has them on the same side, and this was consistent with all the other B35 rods I have lying around.
- Which is more correct?
- Is there a production difference or any specific reason this change would've been made?
- Should the M90 rods be installed only in the direction that buts up the bearing shells against the notches to prevent them from spinning?
- Does direction matter for B35 rods?
The other not-good one was way too tight (like, motor wouldn't spin with it torqued down), and the cause was pretty confusing. Despite thorough, repeated cleaning, the bearing shell was too long, and sat proud of the split between rod and cap wherever it was inserted. I'd assume there is some decent quality control on bearing shells - is this not completely unheard of? We replaced that shell with the best used one I had lying around and it sat flat and plastigauged perfectly, but I'm concerned about mixing new and old shells.
Anyway, advice on what to look out for in assembly is appreciated. I've done my share of heads, but not as experienced with block assembly and looking to learn more. Sadly I haven't been able to find great, in-depth documentation on things like this.
Comment