Jim C. vs. Mark D.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Reddog30
    Noobie
    • Aug 2005
    • 17

    #1

    Jim C. vs. Mark D.

    I'm looking for a chip for my eta, and was going to go with the Jim C., but many people have said that the Mark D. is better. Is this true? If so, in what way, and by how much? Thanks.
  • Reddog30
    Noobie
    • Aug 2005
    • 17

    #2
    anyone?

    Comment

    • Jordan
      R3V OG
      • Oct 2003
      • 12911

      #3
      Mark D's are cheaper, and just as good if not better.

      If you have access to 93 octane all the time he also makes a chip to take full advantage of it where as the other guys only offer chips tuned for 91.
      Tenured Automotive Service Professional - Avid BMW Enthusiast

      Vapor Honing & E30 ABS Pump Refurbishment Service
      https://mtechniqueabs.com/

      Comment

      • BMW BMXER
        R3VLimited
        • Oct 2003
        • 2325

        #4
        I like my Jim C.

        Can't comment on Mark D.

        Sold it.

        Comment

        • Budget Beater
          Banned
          • Aug 2005
          • 230

          #5
          I would love to see a comparison between the Jim C. & Mark D & Ebay chip. i wouldn't be suprised if they were all within 1-2HP of each other. it would be interesting to see the results. i wish someone had the time and resources to do it.

          Comment

          Working...