Originally posted by modifiede30
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dual valve springs into an eta head? Cam options?
Collapse
X
-
Don't forget the good things Hitler did.
-
Originally posted by RedBaron86325[The i cam virtually eliminates the power below 3000rpm. Above 3000 it starts to come on strong all the way to my limiter of 5400. If you can find an old Veloz chip for the eta (6000rpm limiter) it would probably be worthwhile. Another problem you'll face is the amount of airflow of not only the eta intake manifold, but the eta head also. You won't get the punch of the i at the higher rpm. Out of all of the setups I've tried for more power in my eta, by far, the best have been the differential change, chip, and valve springs. Everything else such as an i TB, big AFM, cold air, remote crankcase ventilator, etc... have either moved the powerband or decreased power.
--edit
Don't forget that the e valves are substantially smaller than the i valves. This will also limit the quantity and efficiency of air entering the combustion chamber. It is concievable that this bottleneck may also affect the atomization of the fuel. By all means, play around with it and have fun; but, financially speaking, it would probably be less expensive and easier to find a good used i engine for a transplant.
I'm not too concerned with high-end power, so sticking with the e cam will probably be a good idea.
Also, I have complete i engine in my car that I'm parting out, and I'm going to wait until I get everything else sold off the car before I list the head for sale. If I can make enough to buy another E30 just by selling everything else, I may just end up keeping the i motor that I've got now. But I REALLY don't want to do another engine swap.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eurospeed88This thread has been absolutely awesome, so much great information.
Keep it coming, I need as much info as I can get.
how you can make more grunt from the eta.....and I dunno. Seems you're screwed because it's built up as an economy motor, and not much is really going to change that. Sorry, but it's the frank truth.
I forget what post it was, but someone was calling the valves the bottleneck of the eta. So switching over to i intake or exhaust will only do little, the real problem is the eta head. You're probably just wasting time and effort.
Do a legit stroker man, or something else than tack on a few i parts to the eta and think it'll make you happy......
My input for today: TURBO THAT BITCH!
Someone recently has given fire to my old love of turbocharging technology.
I believe Dinan turboed the eta.
Here's my 2 cent, yo.
With a N/A motor, you are just trying to remove restrictions and get that air pump to draw in more air.
a) Valves suck ass on eta head
b) The motor isn't designed to be gas hungry (hence not air hungry)
c) You can SHOVE ass down its throat with a turbo!
9.0:1 CR would make it not as tolerant as boost, and the ECU I guess would not be as adaptive, but it would surely increase HP and TQ significantly.....and probably be easier than a motor swap. Go for dual valve springs, but instead of moving the power band up, just make it way fatter with forced induction!
peace
EDIT: Talked to Josh. Just interested in quick eta, not trying to find more HP than he could really easily get, in my eyes. That's fine, so what would be the most efficient build up for cheap? Eta cam, dual springs, I intake/exhaust, chip.....etc
Comment
-
Its going in this weekend so if they are different, I might as well swap in the one from my "is" engine while I'm in the process. I'll be replacing it with an adjustable cam gear soon anyway but I don't want to have timing problems since I've increased lift and duration, and shaved/decked. If the timing is too far off, I'll likely slap the valves.Driving is the only way to go faster....
Comment
Comment