Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

M3 Hub Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    M3 Hub Question

    Can a press an e30 m3 hub and bearing on a non e30 spindle/knuckle?
    -

    #2
    No, wont work different struts all together.
    I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃xS : φ(x)) → (∀xS : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

    Comment


      #3
      However, you can install an e30 m3 rear hub into a e30 non-M trailing arm.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View Post
        However, you can install an e30 m3 rear hub into a e30 non-M trailing arm.
        Farbin, Now I have a question.

        Don't know why I don't know this but are the e30 M3 trailing arms the same-same as the el cheapo e30?

        (I really should know this, perhaps it's in the Dead Zone)
        I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃xS : φ(x)) → (∀xS : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

        Comment


          #5
          Damn so its the whole strut assy from an e30 m3 eh that sux
          -

          Comment


            #6
            Yes.



            And, ye, it's a whole strut tube assy, or custom coilover assy's.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View Post
              Yes.



              And, ye, it's a whole strut tube assy, or custom coilover assy's.
              I must be really brain dead today, I have ETK/EPC right in front of me.

              Could have looked it up myself.
              I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃xS : φ(x)) → (∀xS : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

              Comment


                #8
                I won't hold it against you, I just wanted to prevent you from spilling coffee on the technical drawings on your desk. ;)

                Comment


                  #9
                  nevermind, answer posted in another thread
                  Last edited by BrewCity11; 04-16-2009, 02:54 PM.
                  turk@gutenparts.com

                  Originally posted by Janderson
                  Properly placed zip ties will hold bridges together.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X