Can a press an e30 m3 hub and bearing on a non e30 spindle/knuckle?
-
- -
No, wont work different struts all together.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true". -
However, you can install an e30 m3 rear hub into a e30 non-M trailing arm.Comment
-
Farbin, Now I have a question.Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View Post
Don't know why I don't know this but are the e30 M3 trailing arms the same-same as the el cheapo e30?
(I really should know this, perhaps it's in the Dead Zone)I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
Damn so its the whole strut assy from an e30 m3 eh that sux-Comment
-
Yes.
And, ye, it's a whole strut tube assy, or custom coilover assy's.Comment
-
I must be really brain dead today, I have ETK/EPC right in front of me.Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View PostYes.
And, ye, it's a whole strut tube assy, or custom coilover assy's.
Could have looked it up myself.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
I won't hold it against you, I just wanted to prevent you from spilling coffee on the technical drawings on your desk. ;)Comment
-
Comment