ive driven a 95 m3 and ive driven my 3.0l stroker
the power feels different, the stroker is torquier in low end for sure, but i wouldnt say max power is more (solely but dyno here)
IE Stroker Kit vs S50
Collapse
X
-
Oh and Metrix Motorsports will build you a 300+whp S52 for around 8k.Leave a comment:
-
They are quoting 240 crank HP which equates to around 205 at the wheels, look around and see who is actually getting that out of a stroker build. I think there is an Aussie over E30tech making more, but I also remember reading about some "special" correction factor for the dyno to get it too read that high, so to me that's bunk.
With a great tune, headwork, cam and 3.1L 11:1 comp M20 you can expect probably 190-210 whp from what I've read.
In otherwords, to drive around a raunchy 25 year old technology race motor. Guaranteed the cam to make that power will make it a chore to daily drive on the street.
OBD-I S52 has 210+ whp STOCK (well the manifold but not a big deal). High comp pistons, cams, headwork on an OBD-I S52 will get you around 260-270 whp.Leave a comment:
-
What about harassment issues as in smog? Like going to the smog station and having to deal with refs etc. I'd like to hear from California folks especially. It would be a nightmare to do all this work and then not be able to drive in California. I see lots of swapped cars here but frankly I wonder whether these guys are doing things to make 'em pass as oppose to just show up. We live in a State where being green is just a way of life and a freaking CAI will issue you a ticket if spotted. Yes, the cops in my area make you pop the hood and they check.Leave a comment:
-
I'm currently in the middle of an m52 swap. I know quite a few people in the local area that love their 24v swaps.
I was kind of in the same pickle as you, except less power and less budget.
I was thinking budget stroker (b25 head) or m5x. The way I saw it I wanted my car to feel newer. I figured the newer motor with 24v would be smoother, more reliable, and have a better throttle response.
Granted I've never driven either, but I think this is something worth thinking about.Leave a comment:
-
what kind of problems are these guys having? my motor has been trouble free apart from an oil leak from the oil filter/oil pump location.Leave a comment:
-
Sorry wrote it wrong. 215-220whp and your 3.1 is 240 crank. Your 3.1 is less whp. A 2.7 eta stroker might do 185 crank with stock internals and stock ecu. The 2.7 stroker I drove was far from stock.2.7 and 3.1L strokers are miles apart. I have the ability to build a 2.7 seta stroker for far less than 8k. I would absolutely expect the S52 to leave the 2.7 in the dust. There's no comparison.
KevinLeave a comment:
-
Well it sounds like the consensus is the s50/2 hands down. I'm still in the midst of a lot of research for both engines. plus I'll still have to acquire an s52 engine and all the extra parts needed just for the basic swap (e21 booster etc etc). One of the main reasons I was interested in the stroker is because I was going to do a 2.7 and happened upon the IE kit, I've also been witness to a few m50 swaps in my area lately and they have had nothing but problems, I don't do anything half assed but I would be doing the swap myself.
I would be building the ITB system using motorcycle throttles as I've seen some people do here.
it was late, I should clarify, I'm 24, my dad bought the car off the lot in 1987 (still have the original contract) and I've been working on this car since I was able to hold a wrench. 280k on the original engine!
on your budget i really couldn't see the stroker being done. as you know theres going to be alot of modifications needed to be done to the head to support the bottom, schrick cam, enlarged valves etc.
power maybe dissapointing as well, while you may make 200 hp (optimistically but doable), the s50 has a little more in store right away, sure its a little out of your comfort zone thoWell according to what I've been told by IE (I emailed them), the kit is a direct replacement and is supposed to make 240hp without any other modifications other than machining the block for the over sized pistons. They recommend a better cam but larger valves aren't necessary.
Both setups would leave me with the option of boosting, but I'm not that interested since this is my daily.
If I decided on the S50 I would end up doing a major rebuild on the engine. I don't trust just throwing it into the car. So that means new gaskets, machining, pumps, injectors, etc, etc. there's another 2k at least added to the parts budget.The one thing that is good, is that you'll have a rebuilt engine and you don't have to convert anything else. With the S50 you get a newer engine, 24valve DOHC head and a reliable 240-260HP easily. The "bad" is it's a used engine and you have to do a swap. Add up the costs and decide for yourself.
You're the person I need to talk to then, what were the factors that made your decision to go with the S52?
5k is just my parts budget, tuning and everything else if already accounted for and on top of the 5k. My original post already addresses many of the other aspects (fuel injectors, cooling etc) within my budget. I have seen a couple s50 swaps in person and along with the m50 swaps all I've heard is people have problems. this may be because of the quality of the swap or for whatever reason, but all I've heard for the past months with friends doing these swaps are people have been having way to many troubles with the engines themselves.Buying the base kit is only one part of the process. On top of the ITBs, the fueling system must be adressed (bigger injectors), increased cooling, oiling, as well as the engine management and dyno tuning. Add everything together, and you end up with a hefty bill, and 30 year old technology. And you will still be short of the S50 reliability.
2.7 and 3.1L strokers are miles apart. I have the ability to build a 2.7 seta stroker for far less than 8k. I would absolutely expect the S52 to leave the 2.7 in the dust. There's no comparison.I have driven both a built up 2.7 stroker, 200whp and a built up s52, 255whp.
The 2.7 stroker was quick and he about 8k in the engine. The S52 just blew it away and he had about the same cost in it. I have all the parts to build a 2.7 Racing dynamics stroker and a OBD1 s52 for my cabrio. Guess which one I am going with.
KevinLeave a comment:
-
im going to have to agree with everyone else here, 24V will make you much happier in the end.Leave a comment:
-
I have driven both a built up 2.7 stroker, 200whp and a built up s52, 255whp.
The 2.7 stroker was quick and he about 8k in the engine. The S52 just blew it away and he had about the same cost in it. I have all the parts to build a 2.7 Racing dynamics stroker and a OBD1 s52 for my cabrio. Guess which one I am going with.
KevinLeave a comment:
-
Buying the base kit is only one part of the process. On top of the ITBs, the fueling system must be adressed (bigger injectors), increased cooling, oiling, as well as the engine management and dyno tuning. Add everything together, and you end up with a hefty bill, and 30 year old technology. And you will still be short of the S50 reliability.Leave a comment:
-
so you could have a stock s50 with great driveability and room to add more power in the future OR essentially a built to the hilt race motor with no room to go with the same power as the stock s50
there is no question hereLeave a comment:
-
Dbilas is well over $3k for a new setup, there is another company doing E30 ITB's with quality stuff (search for a thread I started awhile back about it).Edit: Good point, I read right over the ITB plans. The Dbilas ITB setup goes for well over a grand if you can get your hands on them (last I saw was priced at $2k), either way that's a huge expense on its own. You have probably figured this out by now, but as with everything, you're going to spend a lot more than you expect on this if you actually go through with it.
I did all the research on this already, rather than build a 3.1L M20, we are getting ready to stuff an OBD-I S52 in my car.Leave a comment:
-
In this case I would go for the S50 because in all these years, I have yet to see a 3 liter M20 run right without detonation or reach 200rwhp without major mods. That Ireland kit came out years ago, yet there are only a few 3.0 liter M20's running around. You can run ITB's with no AFM but you'll still be limited by 2 valves per cylinder. Then there's the timing belt. The one thing that is good, is that you'll have a rebuilt engine and you don't have to convert anything else. With the S50 you get a newer engine, 24valve DOHC head and a reliable 240-260HP easily. The "bad" is it's a used engine and you have to do a swap. Add up the costs and decide for yourself.Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: