Mustang GT v. M3

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 87e30
    replied
    Originally posted by E30 F34R
    I stand corrected, wiki tells all.
    I'm still really fucking happy I'm not you. Even if I dented my car and you didn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wh33lhop
    replied
    Originally posted by 87e30
    But we know that either car we bought we'd mod, so why not start 25k less money.
    That statement makes no logical sense whatsoever. Moreover, who the fuck in the market for an E9x M3 would get a Mustang, or vice versa? The comparison is moot.

    Leave a comment:


  • F34R
    replied
    I stand corrected, wiki tells all.

    Leave a comment:


  • 87e30
    replied
    Originally posted by E30 F34R
    Nope, just math symbol. I know they are the same car, just different years. I was just wondering what he ment. That is all, no need for fun poking Danny boy. :-D
    Not true. Different number of doors.

    Penis penis penis lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Danny
    replied
    Originally posted by E30 F34R
    Nope, just math symbol. I know they are the same car, just different years. I was just wondering what he ment. That is all, no need for fun poking Danny boy. :-D
    Wrong again.

    Leave a comment:


  • F34R
    replied
    Originally posted by Danny
    You have got to be retarded.
    Nope, just math symbol. I know they are the same car, just different years. I was just wondering what he ment. That is all, no need for fun poking Danny boy. :-D

    Leave a comment:


  • Holland
    replied
    Originally posted by E30 F34R
    Are you implying they are getting worse?
    Umm.... same car?

    Leave a comment:


  • greanthumb
    replied
    apples and oranges.:roll:

    Leave a comment:


  • Danny
    replied
    Originally posted by E30 F34R
    Are you implying they are getting worse?
    You have got to be retarded.

    Leave a comment:


  • F34R
    replied
    Originally posted by Holland
    E90>e92>e93.
    Are you implying they are getting worse?

    Leave a comment:


  • Holland
    replied
    E90>e92>e93.

    Leave a comment:


  • F34R
    replied
    Who cares about dragging, I would still take the e92 hands down.

    Leave a comment:


  • 87e30
    replied
    Originally posted by Wh33lhop
    I doubt 98% of either of these car's owners are going to have them long enough for a rebuild.



    Interior, styling, suspension and suspension design, fit and finish the whole way through, probably brake feel and chassis rigidity, probably stereo, etc. But regardless, the Mustang has proven to be a lot of car for the money.
    But we know that either car we bought we'd mod, so why not start 25k less money. you can get a warrantied 500whp for the mustang for just like 7k. Or a non warrantied 600+ whp for 7k.

    Pretty sick.

    I want to drive the new mustang badly. I was underwhelmed by the e92 m3. The e46 was more fun imo.

    Leave a comment:


  • fiftytakedowns
    replied
    you have to take into account also the years of the cars.... the E92 m3 has been around for around 5 years, or maybe less....

    while the mustang is brand new.....

    I garauntee that Bmw has a pretty titties car lined up, they are just waiting to re-release their new 3 series line.

    Leave a comment:


  • Holland
    replied
    Originally posted by Wh33lhop
    While I share the general sentiment of this post, I'm not sure where you're getting those numbers, or how a mad tyte MTI is going to contribute to engine failure or increase the cost of a rebuild.
    I was running those numbers from what I roughly remember. I was adding the ITB comment toward the complexity of the engine which yields the high rebuild costs.

    Leave a comment:

Working...