If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Not likely. You are probably seeing Audi 100 wagons. Similar, but very different.
The rear arches on the 200 are rounded, and flared. The 100 rear arches are squared off and slab-sided.
The 100 and 200 interiors are much, much different. As well as the suspension.
The 200 had an electronic locking center and rear diff. The 200 had an electronic locking rear diff and a torsen center diff.
Then there is the engine. The 200 had a 240hp 20v I5 turbo, also seen in the S4 and S6 of the following generation. The 100 had a 140hp 10v I5 turbo, which generally sucks balls.
Not likely. You are probably seeing Audi 100 wagons. Similar, but very different.
The rear arches on the 200 are rounded, and flared. The 100 rear arches are squared off and slab-sided.
The 100 and 200 interiors are much, much different. As well as the suspension.
The 200 had an electronic locking center and rear diff. The 200 had an electronic locking rear diff and a torsen center diff.
Then there is the engine. The 200 had a 240hp 20v I5 turbo, also seen in the S4 and S6 of the following generation. The 100 had a 140hp 10v I5 turbo, which generally sucks balls.
no, theyre 200s. i used to be huge audi nut and owned a 20v myself. a few buddies of mine have rs2/s2 coupe (converted of course)
Nice. I don't see a lot of guys outside of Motorgeek that know the difference.
There are a few cars I would ditch my E30 for, and a clean urq, rs2, and audi 90 avant are on the list of 'would ditch' cars.
Myself and friend are the only running 200 avants that I know of in the area. Ridiculous cars. There is no reason for that engine to be in that wagon, but I'm not complaining.
Comment