Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Any one know any lawyers that work for peanuts?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
    #1

    Any one know any lawyers that work for peanuts?

    Well less than peanuts actually because I don't have any left.

    Child custody lawer in California and knows a little about sociopathic drug addicted ex-wifes?

    I know, silly place to ask but I thought I might get lucky.

    No sympathy please, my own fucking fault for not letting her choke to death in her own vomit back in '93.
    I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".
    Tags: None
    #2
    It is so story time

    SILBER COMBAT UNIT DELTA (M-Technic Marshal)
    RTFM:http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=56950

    Comment

      #3
      Last edited by atomic; 04-30-2009, 09:02 AM.

      Comment

        #4


        Seriously though, I wish I did. My uncle had the exact same thing happen to him. His ex-wife left the state with the kids despite the fact that she was a documented schizophrenic and during the custody case they sided with her. Apparently back in the 70s-80s in this area they always sided with the mother in custody cases. It's really sad. Keep up the fight man, I hope everything works out. And I'll get sympathetic if I want to damnit!:hitler:
        $500, Diamantschwarz, and a Dream

        Comment

          #5
          I was the kid in that exact situation -- took my dad a couple years to manage to get full custody of me, but he eventually won.

          Best of luck.

          Comment

            #6
            Peanuts, probably not, but I could get the lawyer my stepfather used to get his kids from his drug addicted crazy x-wife. This was some years ago though...

            I could also hook you up with one of my professors, but I don't know if she practices anymore.
            Hemingway said it best. “There are only three sports: bullfighting, motor racing, and mountaineering; all the rest are merely games.”

            Help a brother out, buy your detailing products here...

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Ray Smoodiver View Post
              It is so story time
              Very long story, however in a nutshell:

              I have had full custody since late 1993 (2 kids now 11 and 9) and custody of her daughter since then as well (now 20 and safely out of peril).

              Tomorrow I will be in court answering her exparte filing alleging that I and my wife are abusing the kids.

              She is a pill popping psycho but has always been able to look okay for small periods of time and garner sympathy and she has a history of prevailing in court (for short periods of time).

              I wouldn't freak but she nearly killed the kids the last time she had any custody (she had them for 2 days via court order then the police called me to come and get them at 3 am because she was loaded and insane... 3 hours after I picked them up she wrecked a car and wound up in the hospital).

              So there you go.

              edit: Considering that it's all going down tomorrow a 3pm this thread is now pretty much an exercise in futility but I got it out so that's something.
              Last edited by Liam; 04-30-2009, 12:06 PM.
              I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by Liam View Post
                Well less than peanuts actually because I don't have any left.

                Child custody lawer in California and knows a little about sociopathic drug addicted ex-wifes?

                I know, silly place to ask but I thought I might get lucky.

                No sympathy please, my own fucking fault for not letting her choke to death in her own vomit back in '93.
                My mom is a lawyer,different type though. i could put you in touch with her, but im not sure if she could help, however im sure she would know someone who can

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Stephen View Post
                  My mom is a lawyer,different type though. i could put you in touch with her, but im not sure if she could help, however im sure she would know someone who can
                  Sorry I missed your post until now, though I doubt anything could be put together between then and 3pm manana even if I had caught it.

                  Thank you at any rate

                  Wish me luck, if things go well I might make it to Bimmerfest and I'll tell you all about it.
                  I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

                  Comment

                    #10
                    i don't see where you should have any trouble with the courts. just use her against herself.

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Originally posted by monticello View Post
                      i don't see where you should have any trouble with the courts. just use her against herself.
                      I wish I had your optimism, but my experience after all of this makes me leery at best (and downright terrified for the most part).

                      Courts don't work too well in my opinion.
                      I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Good luck man, not just for you, but for your kids. I saw my brothers and sisters deal with a mom like you described, not cool.
                        Hemingway said it best. “There are only three sports: bullfighting, motor racing, and mountaineering; all the rest are merely games.”

                        Help a brother out, buy your detailing products here...

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Liam View Post
                          I have had full custody since late 1993 (2 kids now 11 and 9) and custody of her daughter since then as well (now 20 and safely out of peril).
                          1993 was sixteen years ago. How could you have been granted custody of an eleven and nine year old sixteen years ago?

                          Comment

                            #14
                            Originally posted by ragged325 View Post
                            1993 was sixteen years ago. How could you have been granted custody of an eleven and nine year old sixteen years ago?
                            Someone has an aptitude for math I see...

                            Closing SOON!
                            "LAST CHANCE FOR G.A.S." DEAL IS ON NOW

                            Luke AT germanaudiospecialties DOT com or text 425-761-6450, or for quickest answers, call me at the shop 360-669-0398

                            Thanks for 10 years of fun!

                            Comment

                              #15
                              the 2 of you sound like 2 pees in a pod! shes a psycho and you have mulitple personalities!!! congrats.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X