The Glenn Beck Program

[kronus]

News Corp, which owns the Fox News Channel, gave more to the DNC in the previous election cycle then they did to the RNC by a margin of 77% to 23%:

http://www.opensecrets.org/industrie...e=2008&ind=B02


And Rupert Murdoch, the "conservative" owner of FNC held a fundraiser for Hillary Clinton before the last election:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/09/politics/main1600694.shtml

Of course, I'm sure you prefer your news from the MSM, which donated 78% of their campaign money to the DNC in the last election cycle and 70% since 1990:

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=B02

So, please explain to all of us - just how is FNC the biggest private donor to the GOP when the facts show the opposite?

And since the MSM donated 78% of their campaign funds to the DNC in the last election cycle and 70% since 1990, is that indicative of an inherent bias in the media favoring Democrats?

So you seriously claim that Fox news is not slanted?

[nickpdx]

I liked his faked tears over his "9/12" project, proclaiming that America was never more together the day after 9/11.

Also I like that he's a douche bag hypocrite liar who is willing to exploit any national tragedy to boost his own ratings:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf33g9ep4YU

What a fucking asshole. Liberal or conservative doesn't even enter into it, he's just a terrible human.

+1...what a cockrag.

[E30 Cabrio]

QFT. Then again, so is everyone else on Faux News. I prefer to get my news from sources that aren't run by the GOPs single biggest private contributor.

News Corp, which owns the Fox News Channel, gave more to the DNC in the previous election cycle then they did to the RNC by a margin of 77% to 23%:

http://www.opensecrets.org/industrie...e=2008&ind=B02


And Rupert Murdoch, the "conservative" owner of FNC held a fundraiser for Hillary Clinton before the last election:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/09/politics/main1600694.shtml

Of course, I'm sure you prefer your news from the MSM, which donated 78% of their campaign money to the DNC in the last election cycle and 70% since 1990:

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=B02

So, please explain to all of us - just how is FNC the biggest private donor to the GOP when the facts show the opposite?

And since the MSM donated 78% of their campaign funds to the DNC in the last election cycle and 70% since 1990, is that indicative of an inherent bias in the media favoring Democrats?

Sometimes he's on, but when he's off, he's dead off. And off too often.

I wonder if he says stuff just for ratings. Like whack job Anne Coulter.

..or O'Reilley, Hannity, Limbaugh, etc.

[joshh]

Sometimes he's on, but when he's off, he's dead off. And off too often.

I wonder if he says stuff just for ratings. Like whack job Anne Coulter.

[transatlantic0207]

hehe, i watch fox for the hot chicks and red eye...gb speaks in hyperbole and doesn't even believe half the crap he says

[Collin]

I liked his faked tears over his "9/12" project, proclaiming that America was never more together the day after 9/11.

Also I like that he's a douche bag hypocrite liar who is willing to exploit any national tragedy to boost his own ratings:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf33g9ep4YU

What a fucking asshole. Liberal or conservative doesn't even enter into it, he's just a terrible human.

[CorvallisBMW]

Between his fake crying and lame ass nerdy humor, which he thinks is so hilarious, I would say he is the definition of a douche bag.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rM4xqnukQrM&feature=related

QFT. Then again, so is everyone else on Faux News. I prefer to get my news from sources that aren't run by the GOPs single biggest private contributor.

[mrsleeve]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

not getting defensive at all just saying is all :D

[aaron325ix]

I like beck, I have a similar sense of humor and I share many of his view points. Dose he go a bit over board some times yeah sure, who dose not.

Shows like this are more for entertainment value, while getting a dose of whats going on that is not highly reported in many other outlets.

You dont like him, thats fine there are 400 other stations out there. I am sure there is something to watch.

Yea, you told us your opinion on page 1, which is what OP asked for and what everyone else has done. No need to get defensive because others dont agree. Now go laugh your ass off to the GB show... or cry. :p

[mrsleeve]

I like beck, I have a similar sense of humor and I share many of his view points. Dose he go a bit over board some times yeah sure, who dose not.

Shows like this are more for entertainment value, while getting a dose of whats going on that is not highly reported in many other outlets.

You dont like him, thats fine there are 400 other stations out there. I am sure there is something to watch.

[TDE30]

Between his fake crying and lame ass nerdy humor, which he thinks is so hilarious, I would say he is the definition of a douche bag.

Yup, he thinks he is much more humorous than he actually is. It's no wonder those 'tards at Fox picked him up from CNN.

[aaron325ix]

Between his fake crying and lame ass nerdy humor, which he thinks is so hilarious, I would say he is the definition of a douche bag.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rM4xqnukQrM&feature=related

[Pinepig]

The guy is a fucking tool...

You didn't really need to post in this topic, your opinion was already known.

[Cabrio330]

That is a good example of why I don't like Beck or Hannity - they are pretty divisive, so I can hardly argue their case (even when they have a good point) to those who hate them. All they do is muddy the conservative message so that people aren't able to truly get the points. I just roll my eyes.

But, I won't go so far as to say Beck or Hannity are as embarrasing and moronic as Olberman, Matthews, Maddow, Maher, et al. If I were a liberal, I would be rolling my eyes at them.

Watch Tony Snow on the Bill Maher show. He is calm, polite, reasoned and well spoken despite being the lone conservative on the panel. Compare him to the guy from Rolling Stone - does he offer ANYTHING of substance in the discussion? No. So why do people like that get exposure? Baffles me.

There are too many of those Rolling Stone types on both sides. You may not agree with Tony and his points, but he at least comes across as someone who has carefully considered the issues.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZiGKpYlJJg