Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I love going to court...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    I love going to court...

    I love going to court to fight for custody... Something about it is just so... Familiar... Gives me this warm fuzzy feeling.

    Once again it's time to crawl up some asses and dredge up some dirt in the name of protecting the kids...

    One question though...

    Do I adopt a "Scorched Earth Policy" calling in the "Air Strike"?

    Or do I "Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Dogs of War?

    What suggestions of ways to tip the balance in wresting my children from the clutches of my drug addicted psycho bitch ex wife have you?

    Any ideas on how to push her over the edge? Possibly bringing on an overdose and her demise (would have to be predictable as to when though being that we can't let her take the little ones if they are there as well, kind of difficult huh)?

    I only ask all this because the last time she had any custody (2005) she nearly killed them.

    Stupid fucking family courts...




    Blahhhhh, I thought getting that out would make me feel better, didn't fucking work.
    I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".
    Tags: None
    #2
    You have the answer. Just prove the judge/mediator that your ex is a crack whore, and therefore that she can't take care of the kids, and you get custody. Or did I miss something?
    Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

    massivebrakes.com

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056




    Comment

      #3
      cort ordered psc eval, randon drug test???? shit all over her, unless there is some lingering love issues........

      do what ever is neccessary to protect the kids, this comming from someone who has no kids, and does not care for them.
      seien Sie größer, als Sie erscheinen


      Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

      Comment

        #4
        why are you fighting for custody if she hasn't had custody since 2005(i'm assuming the kids were with you)? if she nearly killed them, she shouldn't have unsupervised visitation(laws may be different where you are). ask for a drug screening and a psychological evaluation unless you are just as guilty. are the children old enough to have a say in the matter? if she is a drug addict, where is she getting money for a custody battle?

        Comment

          #5
          She just won some limited custody today ( I guess I should have been clearer).

          She took me to court "in pro per" (representing herself).

          She claims she has been sober for nearly a year (not true, she was several times just in April)

          The courts have little understanding of what people like this are like,

          They see what's in front of them.


          Originally posted by der affe View Post
          cort ordered psc eval, randon drug test???? shit all over her, unless there is some lingering love issues........



          do what ever is neccessary to protect the kids, this comming from someone who has no kids, and does not care for them.

          No lingering love here, I do still have the crazy lady clause in the papers (drug testing etc) but it's kind of a rubber sword.

          Originally posted by Massive Lee View Post
          You have the answer. Just prove the judge/mediator that your ex is a crack whore, and therefore that she can't take care of the kids, and you get custody. Or did I miss something?
          Did that took from something like 2003 to 2005 and cost a house and an aditional $300,000 (who says the courts don't work).

          Kind of still broke now... Stuff is kind of hard to Prove as well.
          I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

          Comment

            #6
            The courts accept hearsay.
            Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

            "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

            ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

            Comment

              #7
              Group Buy on front and rear strut braces and I'll send you the best legal advice in the country regarding child custody disputes.
              Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
              Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries

              www.gutenparts.com
              One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!

              Comment

                #8
                hire #47... ;) good luck though mate.

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by joshh View Post
                  The courts accept hearsay.
                  Indeed. It's also called witnesses.
                  Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

                  massivebrakes.com

                  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056




                  Comment

                  Previous template Next
                  Working...
                  X