Is it ok to take something without consent and give it to someone else?

[monticello]

what a fucking retarded thread.

[blunttech]

the answers in this poll make me want to puke
where the fuck do these values come from?? retarded lib parents raising little entitlement waffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffless. try working for something in your worthless lives

[lowlightbw]

i have been enlightened by your enlightening poll. :(

[Joey Link]

Funny, you're the only person I know that has those views is you :P

We hang out with the same group of people, think harder. I can name a bunch off the top of my head; Ken, Darrin, Justin, Ty, Ty, Jenny, just to name a few, not including those we know who voted in this poll :D

[CorvallisBMW]

I like to think I have a pretty diverse group of friends, but the only people I know that agree with you and Kenny are you and Kenny :P

Side note, lookin forward to installing those shocks tomorrow. COD4 this evening?

Funny, you're the only person I know that has those views is you :P

Yes on COD4.

edit: this is redundant, I just sent you a text saying I'll be over in an hour. :facepalm:

[Joey Link]

Because it depends on who you are taking from, who you are giving to as well as what you are taking and what will result from your action.

So am I right to gather from your statements that you are OK with theft, depending on who is doing the stealing and who is benefiting from the theft?

[Pinepig]

Human lives are priceless.

Bullshit, in certain parts of the world they are pretty much worthless.

There is ideology and there is reality, they don't mix.

[Alkasquawlik]

No. What's mine is mine, don't fucking touch it, I earned it. If I want to give some to someone, I will do it on my own, but do not force me.

o and balloshinakus was the uninformed idiot in the Obama thread, so don't pay him any attention.

how cant it be that simple

Because it depends on who you are taking from, who you are giving to as well as what you are taking and what will result from your action.

[mrsleeve]

I think this issue is a little more complicated than Yes/No can handle...

how cant it be that simple

^^^ I can't agree with this.

Then you are immoral.

Money and wealth are held very high in our society but the health and well being of the citizens of this country comes first. Human lives are priceless.

[Joey Link]

I think I've clarified as much as I'd like. I don't see the situation in which it would make a difference which 'entity' is taking from which 'entity' without their consent, for the purpose of giving to another 'entity'. We could be talking about a red rubber ball on a school playground, foreign aid, federal welfare programs, there are thousands of possibilities. I left it vague on purpose to see where people draw the line on what I thought was a well established principle that 'thou shall not steal'.

[Farbin Kaiber]

^^^ I can't agree with this.

If it means taking money from a millionaire to pay for the health care of a less privileged individual so that they shall live, then the answer is definitely a yes.

Bill Gates can do just fine with one less Porsche in his garage. Joe Blow cannot do just fine if hes dead.

[gazellebeigem3]

its a little ambiguous, ill wait for the other shoe to drop as im sure you have an exact situation in mind