Five Sept. 11 Suspects to Face Trial in New York

[blunttech]

So let me get this straight Blunt.. According to you the US government should be able to label someone a terrorist and then just kill them with no trial? What if by some mistake they labeled you as a terrorist, killed you, then someone realized it wasn't you they were after? You're a fucking retard. Good day.

theyre all out of the pacific NW. they must be cloning retards out that way

[blunttech]

So let me get this straight Blunt.. According to you the US government should be able to label someone a terrorist and then just kill them with no trial? What if by some mistake they labeled you as a terrorist, killed you, then someone realized it wasn't you they were after? You're a fucking retard. Good day.

good day sir they should be tried in a military tribunal. they have confessed to what they did and are proud of it. are you doubting their guilt? they are not entitled to the same rights you and i are.
im laughing at what a foolish little boy you have become listening to your liberal teachers.
the usa is in the situation it is today because of pieces of shit like you.

[mrsleeve]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Do a search for Holmes on here, This LB dude has to be Holmes there is not other explanation

I think this fits this topic very well

THE TERRORIST MICRO CHIP
is intended to be implanted in terrorists.

The implant is specifically designed to be installed in the forehead.

When properly installed, it will allow the one implanted, to speak to God.

It comes in various sizes:



The exact size of the implant will be selected by a well-trained and highly skilled technician.

The implant may or may not be painless. Side effects, like headaches and nausea, are temporary.

Some bleeding or swelling may occur at the injection site.

Please enjoy the security we provide for you.

Best regards,

[balooshinakus]

So let me get this straight Blunt.. According to you the US government should be able to label someone a terrorist and then just kill them with no trial? What if by some mistake they labeled you as a terrorist, killed you, then someone realized it wasn't you they were after? You're a fucking retard. Good day.

[transatlantic0207]

This is a silly argument...
With all due respect if you're not, you must be in HS right?
I know they don't teach world history anymore than what the US involvement was but the world isn't as black and white as the textbooks make it. Everything is relative when it comes to nation states.

As if the use kamikazee pilots put japan further up on the moral ladder? Also, I think the chinese will beg to difer with the plight of the poor japanese populace during ww2....if you must then look up the reason why

Can we get back on topic?

[LBJefferies]

i don't see the parallel to topic

You're right, he is off topic but he makes a good point. This country is a giant hypocritical pile of shit. We think dropping nukes on Japan and incinerating hundreds of thousands of people was ok but when something similiar happens to us we some how hold the moral high ground.

[mrsleeve]

LEE, I am not even gonna go near that with a 10 foot pole.

[transatlantic0207]

i don't see the parallel to topic

[Massive Lee]

I might drop a bomb here, but I wonder how many Americans have been trialed abroad for the similar "legitimized" atrocities they have done in the past. 3000 death on US soil is horrible, but only a fraction of other atrocities commited on foreign warfares by US soldiers. And we're still talking civilians casualties here. Blanket napalm bombing and massive spraying of hyper non-resilient and destructive Agent Orange in Vietnam which still kills children 35 years later.

Oh. I am sorry. It was war on communism. So that was okay...

Impact of Agent Orange today. NWS.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zay0zcC0K4

[transatlantic0207]

so we are also at 'war' with the drug cartels? 'war on drugs'

[blunttech]

I have a few issues and some of them are conflicting but bear with me.

The five that are on trial planned or had a hand in the attack on 9-11, which was on us soil. Granted they were apprehended overseas by the military but their crime relates to an attack on domestic soil. They weren't military advisors, spies, and they didn't have official positions in any gov't. They were bandits who recruit uneducated, destitute, mentally vunerable people to carry out their twisted manifest. Sorta like any other criminal organization.

By calling them war criminals, it's essentially emboldening their cause because they are fighting for a purpose and see themselves and are percieved as equal warriors to 'big bad US military'. When you call them criminals and treat them as criminals the aura surrounding them lessens.

With regards to the hijackers, lets say they lived....as foreign nationals, they are subject to the laws of the country they are in. They had visas to be in the country, they would be subject to justice in civilian courts just like 'paco the drug cartel runner/head/dealer/etc'.

The fact that these guys planned the attack that happened on domestic soil, makes them subject to the civilian court system. Case in point, We extradite foreign nationals for crimes committed against US interests, citizens, etc ALL THE TIME and convict them with no problems. Our legal system does have prosecution provisions for these crimes.

The attacks on 9/11 were horrible and were truely a show of pure evilness, however imo we are not at war with terrorists. These criminals will be subject to close to 3000 counts of murder, etc and they will probably get the death penalty. When the trial happens, I hope the prosecution diminishes the 'fantasy' about them, and paints them out be severely twisted criminals over some jihadi.

Ok here is a contradiction, I am surprised at the bravado of AG. Holder and others by stating that they are sure of the outcome, and that the trial location has special meaning to the city, yada yada yada....didn't he essentially give the defense lawyers grounds to motion for a change of venue, mistrial due to prosecutorial misconduct, and a whole slew of other technicalities? It seems as if we are conducting show trials for the world to see, and acting as if it's an accurate portrayal of our 'superior' legal system.

/rant :hitler:

"however imo we are not at war with terrorists."

OH PLEASE

[Miasma]

There should be no trial.

Just break their hand's and feet and drop them out of a helicopter at the Chernobyl ground zero.

[mrsleeve]

there should be no trial. we are treating these shitbags as criminals not terrorists. they have no rights. this is a joke

x 100 fucking million




while they are alive force them to eat bacon every day.,

[transatlantic0207]

I have a few issues and some of them are conflicting but bear with me.

The five that are on trial planned or had a hand in the attack on 9-11, which was on us soil. Granted they were apprehended overseas by the military but their crime relates to an attack on domestic soil. They weren't military advisors, spies, and they didn't have official positions in any gov't. They were bandits who recruit uneducated, destitute, mentally vunerable people to carry out their twisted manifest. Sorta like any other criminal organization.

By calling them war criminals, it's essentially emboldening their cause because they are fighting for a purpose and see themselves and are percieved as equal warriors to 'big bad US military'. When you call them criminals and treat them as criminals the aura surrounding them lessens.

With regards to the hijackers, lets say they lived....as foreign nationals, they are subject to the laws of the country they are in. They had visas to be in the country, they would be subject to justice in civilian courts just like 'paco the drug cartel runner/head/dealer/etc'.

The fact that these guys planned the attack that happened on domestic soil, makes them subject to the civilian court system. Case in point, We extradite foreign nationals for crimes committed against US interests, citizens, etc ALL THE TIME and convict them with no problems. Our legal system does have prosecution provisions for these crimes.

The attacks on 9/11 were horrible and were truely a show of pure evilness, however imo we are not at war with terrorists. These criminals will be subject to close to 3000 counts of murder, etc and they will probably get the death penalty. When the trial happens, I hope the prosecution diminishes the 'fantasy' about them, and paints them out be severely twisted criminals over some jihadi.

Ok here is a contradiction, I am surprised at the bravado of AG. Holder and others by stating that they are sure of the outcome, and that the trial location has special meaning to the city, yada yada yada....didn't he essentially give the defense lawyers grounds to motion for a change of venue, mistrial due to prosecutorial misconduct, and a whole slew of other technicalities? It seems as if we are conducting show trials for the world to see, and acting as if it's an accurate portrayal of our 'superior' legal system.

/rant :hitler:

[e30-RTN]

there should be no trial. we are treating these shitbags as criminals not terrorists. they have no rights. this is a joke

THANK YOU!


What the fuck is wrong with you idiots. We are at war with these assholes. They a POWs...Did your grandparents get put on trial in WW2? NO!

Give me the gun and I'll give them a trial!