If anyone really wants to understand the climate change.

[dvs909]

read this article. extremely well thought it with a huge amount of research to back it up.

http://www.petitionproject.org/gw_article/Review_Article_HTML.php

[SpyHunter]

You mean the earth is warmed by the SUN!!! What?! No way.


I have been saying this for years. Man thinks much to highly of itself, and its impact upon the earth. Should we be more diligent in preserving natural resources? Yes. Are we killing the planet? No.

The planet, and its weather/climate, go through cycles. Everything does. And there are MANY things that contribute to those cycles. Much more then just whats in the atmosphere. I have long said that the sun itself plays a much bigger role then what we were led to believe. It only makes sense.

I think, sometimes, people look to hard for answers, when they are right there in front of their face. They refuse to believe in the obvious answer.

[dvs909]

its just nice to have well explained evidence to email to your hippie friends.

[hugh jass]

that site 11 year old conservatard bullshit

http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medicine

at least research your links before you post them as 'evidence'

[SpyHunter]

I still stand by what I said. Those who think our impact is but a small portion of what actually effects the climate, are not taking all things into account.

[Vedubin01]

its all a hoax

http://www.infowars.com/climate-change-hoax-of-the-century/

[joshh]

The "Global Warming" religion is coming to an end.

[Farbin Kaiber]

http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/

Great documentary, it's on youtube, go watch it. I recorded it on Dish Network on the Sundance Channel last month.

[hugh jass]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gre...arming_Swindle

Great documentary, it's on youtube, go watch it. I recorded it on Dish Network on the Sundance Channel last month.

Based on the link you provided, it sounds like a sham

[LBJefferies]

It is the duty of every human being, for the sake of science and truth, to be a skeptic.

[Ral]

It is the duty of every human being, for the sake of science and truth, to be a skeptic.

+5 bro points for the totally rad quote, duude. Like, Deeeeep.

[gwb72tii]

funny how the people/scientists that promoted the GW alarmist bullshit are the ones taking all the money and manipulating the data, after saying the "deniers" were doing the exact same thing.

fucking ROFLMFAO

we've all been played

[mrsleeve]

The cat is outta the bag, it all been a hoax to keep the govt grants rolling in. WE have nothing to do with GW CO2 accounts for .03-.04% of total gasses in the atmosphere and less than .1% of all green house gasses Water vapor is the largest most efficient gas at trapping heat.


USE you head here if my moms 6th graders can figure this sham out with common sense, surely you can

that site 11 year old conservatard bullshit

http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medicine

at least research your links before you post them as 'evidence'

[Hallen]

that site 11 year old conservatard bullshit

http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medicine

at least research your links before you post them as 'evidence'

How can you possibly read that drivel on that page and give it one ounce of credibility? I'm not trying to argue here about the validity of human caused global warming. I am talking about the simple minded sheeple who could possibly take the information on this website as a valid case for or against anything.

It starts as nothing more than a major ad hominem attack. It doesn't try to do anything but debunk the people involved because they are hayseeds living in a remote valley in hickville Oregon.

It then goes on to rant about how a petition was sent out. They then go to talking about the people involved throwing in political innuendo and implying much but saying nothing.

When do they get on with actually providing any evidence or discussion on the actual topic?? Oh, that's right, since they didn't "Peer Review" this stuff, and it didn't come from one of their sources, it's obviously not science. All that is necessary is to discredit the presenter and ignore the data. Funny, now it turns out that this non-credible, non-climate scientist actually had it right and their vaunted peer reviews have actually been outed as being nothing more than a good-ol-boy club for those on the take for government funds and not really a scientific evaluation of other work. The page you linked was simple evidence that certain parts of this "scientific community" were strong arming others into toeing the politically correct, scientifically invalid line.

They were the ones covering up data and making WAG's galore just to support their agenda (not even a theory, just an agenda). Wow, talk about bad science. Every "scientist" involved on the global warming band wagon should have their PhD's revoked. If they had a way of refuting the data in that report, they would have. But they didn't. What does that tell you?

Good grief.