If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Well, let's see. The first one sucked so bad I almost didn't finish watching it.
So.....assuming that, like most sequels, this is only 50% as good as the first movie...I'm gonna say that's why it was straight to DVD.
Originally posted by accident
I have achieved the title of Douche of the month.
Discuss.
Originally posted by kronus
It was probably pissed off because it didn't want to pay taxes for poor people's healthcare.
Neg, the first movie was pretty good, but this one followed the typical sequel route of sucking more than its predecessor. I think The Transporter series had better acting than this movie did.
Iain...
- Trey
E90 325i/6(ZSP, ZPP, ZCW) E36 325i sedan E30 325i sedan Volvo 945T
It wasn't funny even when it tried to be.
The ending was predictable.
The special effects were outdated and overplayed.
The plot was subpar and unimaginative.
The writing was shabby.
The acting was mediocre at best(with the exception of Ray Liotta).
It was just another run of the mill piece of Hollywood trash.
A peice of shit smoothed over to look sexy, slick and hip is still a peice of shit. When I watch movies, I hold them to a high standard, especially when I consider how much they cost to produce. If you thought the first one was that good, then you have low standards for movies. You're probably one of those people who think that Armageddon and Titanic were two of the best films of all time.
Originally posted by accident
I have achieved the title of Douche of the month.
Discuss.
Originally posted by kronus
It was probably pissed off because it didn't want to pay taxes for poor people's healthcare.
Comment