Do you like Government telling you what you need to eat.
-
Do you like Government telling you what you need to eat.Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison
"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama -
Your title is misleading.
Some bonehead city counselman in Brooklyn has proposed a ban. There's no way in hell it will pass.Originally posted by Gruelius -
Its apparently stirring up some shit in the culinary world. This is the city that banned trans fats.Comment
-
trans-fat banned, proposed salt ban, cigarette tax (almost 10 bux a pack), booze taxed ...NO smoking in PUBLIC PARKS...
pretty soon farting will be banned in NYC
for your amusement: http://gothamist.com/2010/02/23/city...ts_at_scho.phpComment
-
-
-
well they already banned transfats, I could see it happening. Fucking stupid.Originally posted by KenC View PostRollin' with a GeistkuchenComment
-
All those in NJ should be up in arms. Seriously. There's NO reason the Government should be telling you in any way what you can put on your food. Come the fuck on, NY. Get angry. Get fucking pissed. I want to see "Salt Riots of 2010" in the History books. Just make a point to riot only in front of the proposers house.Need a part? PM me.
Get your Bass on. Luke's r3v Boxes are here: http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=198123Comment
-
FFFFFFFFFuuuuuuuuuuUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUU. This story makes california look good!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dozyproductions View Post
Actually it does and that's saying a lot.Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison
"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack ObamaComment
-
If they ban salt you will see a dramitic increase in the use of "sodium chloride" in most resturants....the legislatiors will nere know the difference88 325ic ~~~> Rusty and ugly
85 E ~~~> RIPComment
-
they're not banning salt you idiots. they're saying cooks don't add the salt, you add however much you want at your table.
jesus people are stupid.Originally posted by bluntComment
-
Originally posted by ColdAccord View Post
theres a difference between cooked with salt and salt added at the table. will never taste the same.90 E30 325iComment
-
Yeah, this makes it perfectly ok then.Originally posted by ColdAccord View PostRollin' with a GeistkuchenComment
-
i'm not saying it's ok, nor do i think it should/will pass. it's just hilarious how many things people omit when convenient to their argumentOriginally posted by bluntComment
Comment