Exactly. It's not that we don't have the physical room to fit more people, it's that we don't have the resources to sustain them at current standards of living, let alone with the developing world getting ever more 'developed'. It's one thing to have 2B+ Chinese and Indians living in poverty, but it's quickly becoming 2B+ of middle class who use 10x the resources.
Also, it takes 40-50 years after birth rates to go down for population curves to even begin to level off. China instituted the 1-child policy in 1979, 31 years ago. And their population is still exploding.
Wrap your mind around this!
Collapse
X
-
Land mass isn't the problem with overpopulation, resource availability and distribution is. And it's currently an issue.Leave a comment:
-
Birthrates are actually declining globally, and the U.S. is historically underpopulated considering how much land we actually have. Populations are just concentrated in cities mainly, though it seems otherwise. Just sayin.Leave a comment:
-
-
There was a guy who spoke at one of the T.E.D. conferences who spoke more in depth on this theory. It was a pretty amazing presentation, I wish I could remember his name. He looked absolutely insane but his theories made sense.Leave a comment:
-
No one will live 300+yrs if socialized medicine takes over. The research will stop and or be so over controlled that no breakthroughs will ever be found.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
-
"I'm sorry Mr. Johnson, you have cancer. You have only 300 years left"Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: