Producing Diesel from sun, water, and CO2?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bene
    replied
    Originally posted by E30Kaiser
    Me too!


    word.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tree18is
    replied
    every body thinks diesel is a dirty word.. I hope this works we would be set up.

    Leave a comment:


  • E30Kaiser
    replied
    Originally posted by NitroRustlerDriver
    Yeah, I'd buy one.
    Me too!

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewBird
    replied
    Originally posted by emoshun
    With gas approaching $4 gal, I welcome this kind of thinking.

    I'd buy a turbo diesel if this becomes a reality.


    Yeah, I'd buy one.

    Leave a comment:


  • E30Kaiser
    replied
    Originally posted by tjts1
    Old news.
    At first glance they appear to be the same, but the two are very different and the website for the company points out many things that make them different. The most obvious is the difference between Biodiesel and Diesel.

    Originally posted by mrsleeve
    Yes posted from my phone, stupid predictive text.


    I have not watched the vids just read an article recently about this and the land use requirements were not mentioned in that one.

    so in that case what will the catch be, Like I said there is always a catch
    It is planned to produce 15,000 gallons of diesel per year and 25,000 of ethanol per year per acre, apparently they are already at 10,000 gallons of ethanol per year per acre at the lab level. Also it isn't like Biodiesel where you have to mix it with diesel still especially in cold weather, it is straight diesel.

    The only catch I can see is that they keep mentioning it isn't toxic and there is no chance of it "escaping" into the environment, which leads me to believe they are lying and it is going to kill us all.
    Last edited by E30Kaiser; 02-28-2011, 11:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • delfin
    replied
    1) Put solar panels in space
    2) Use microwaves to beam it to the surface
    3) Energy, or use it to power these algaes
    4) Win/Profit

    no need for ?

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelStu
    replied
    This like a great idea for roof-tops - a more useful iteration of a green-roof.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fusion
    replied
    4 bucks a gallon?
    We're getting close to 8 just because the monkeys are protesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bene
    replied
    from http://www.jc-solarhomes.com/solar_energy_facts.htm
    4. ENERGY IN SUNLIGHT: The energy from the sun varies from place to place and is very dependent on weather conditions. Without an atmosphere 1.4 KW/m2 per hour is available, but with an atmosphere we can only count on 1KW/m2 per hour in the absence of clouds. So, if asked how much 3 hours of sunlight on one square meter is worth what would you say?
    Obviously there's a lot of variables involved, time and location being the most complicated.

    I'll look into it more when I get home.

    Leave a comment:


  • s0urce
    replied
    My Delorean runs on banana peels.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bene
    replied
    *fixed
    Originally posted by mrsleeve
    OOOOOk

    I am betting real estate/Oceanic space is prolly going to kill this. I am betting it going to take HUGE expanses of space to make this happen, and the product will be very little fuel per acre used.
    Thats a good point. It makes me wonder, on average over a year, how much solar energy is distributed over a square meter at say 4000 ft...

    time to Google.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    Originally posted by Kershaw
    dude, you really need to go back and edit your post. you arent making any sense. maybe you're typing from a phone and you mean betting, not better?

    anyway, watch the second video. they claim this has a very fuel per acre density. dude claims 10% of new mexico could be used to produce all of the us' fuel needs. and it can be produced in the desert. which is great.
    Yes posted from my phone, stupid predictive text.


    I have not watched the vids just read an article recently about this and the land use requirements were not mentioned in that one.

    so in that case what will the catch be, Like I said there is always a catch

    Leave a comment:


  • Kershaw
    replied
    dude, you really need to go back and edit your post. you arent making any sense. maybe you're typing from a phone and you mean betting, not better?

    anyway, watch the second video. they claim this has a very fuel per acre density. dude claims 10% of new mexico could be used to produce all of the us' fuel needs. and it can be produced in the desert. which is great.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    Originally posted by Bene
    A photosynthetic microbe that eats organic material and poops out oxygen and diesel fuel. I can't think of a catch.

    However, I am predicting that in over the next few years, Fox News will slowly seep into the Jesus fearing subconscious that altering one of god's creatures to provide fuel for our society is 'playing god'.

    If "big oil" doesn't come up with a more legitimate 'catch' in the next few years, we should be good to go.

    the only 'bad' thing I can think of is that gasoline prices might go up. which is bad if you're like most of the people on this board and like driving older cars.
    OOOOOk

    I am better real estate/Oceanic space is prolly going to kill this. I am better it going to take HUGE expanses of space to make this happen, and the product will be very little fuel per acre used.

    Leave a comment:


  • M42Power
    replied
    123d Anyone?

    Leave a comment:

Working...