R&T vs MT vs C&D

[Avus E30]

Just reading my new R&T and I thought i would see what you guys read. I get C&D and R&T. I prefer R&T over all the rest.

[Jordan325iC]

R&T also
Though I don't have any exposure to motor trend.

[niq_nak]

R&T seems to cover more exotics, but i always thought C&D had better writers.

[Dave]

R&T is okay as well. Motor Trend sucks. Always has.

[Brew]

Car and Driver still has the best writing, but their photography definitely isn't up to par with the other two. The UK mags, like Evo and Top Gear have all three beat easily, too bad they're so expensive.

[BimmerToad]

EVO is by far the best. As well as the most expensive. The track car of the year issues are always a fun read ;)

[Rob]

C&D, i can look at pictures all day on the internet, their writing is the best. Automobile is good too.

Lets not get started on the writing in the 'special' mags, (SCC, any honda/jap specific rag)

[e30Matt]

I like Grassroots Motorsports. Don't know who all gets that, though.

Also EVO, occasionally Forza, and F1 Racing Magazine.

[RCWells]

C&D has always had the best editors imo. Their articles are better written. R&T always had more pics.

[Mot]

Any one ever checked out an Issue of Modified Luxury and Exotics... decent writing, amazing pics, very cool cars.