Halo 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JK_E30
    E30 Addict
    • Jan 2007
    • 545

    #31
    We got to the line at around 10:45 and was at home by 12:15 putting in the disc.

    Beat it before 5am. Great game though! I plan on playing it again but taking more time to explore everything and unlock everything.

    M50B25tu

    Comment

    • backtrail69
      R3V Elite
      • Jul 2005
      • 4471

      #32
      My next door neighbor just got it this afternoon. We played it for a while... didn't impress me much. Just Halo 2 with new maps and gadgets...
      :: PNW Crew ::
      '87 325 4dr, '74 2002

      Comment

      • JK_E30
        E30 Addict
        • Jan 2007
        • 545

        #33
        Originally posted by backtrail69
        My next door neighbor just got it this afternoon. We played it for a while... didn't impress me much. Just Halo 2 with new maps and gadgets...
        Better graphics, if your neighbor is cool enough and has a high def tv.

        M50B25tu

        Comment

        • James Crivellone
          Head Janitor
          • Oct 2003
          • 6291

          #34
          The graphics suck ass, and its 4:3 in most of the game, however its pretty fun, no better then Halo1/2 though.

          Took about 5 hours to beat it, with a pretty weak ending. To be honest I was pretty disappointed with it, with all the hype I really expected it to be awesome, but the 4:3 campaign limitation REALLY pissed me off, I mean hell its a game designed for a 720p/1080p console, and I'm playing it on a matching 1080p television, and I need to play it with 4:3 in campaign.

          Either way, here's the end credits, play it, its fairly entertaining, but its just another Halo to me
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • M42Technik
            R3V OG
            • Dec 2003
            • 9781

            #35
            Can someone ruin the ending for me? Thanks.
            Reminiscing...

            Comment

            • atomic
              R3V Elite
              • Jun 2007
              • 5691

              #36
              Originally posted by James Crivellone
              The graphics suck ass, and its 4:3 in most of the game, however its pretty fun, no better then Halo1/2 though.

              Took about 5 hours to beat it, with a pretty weak ending. To be honest I was pretty disappointed with it, with all the hype I really expected it to be awesome, but the 4:3 campaign limitation REALLY pissed me off, I mean hell its a game designed for a 720p/1080p console, and I'm playing it on a matching 1080p television, and I need to play it with 4:3 in campaign.

              Either way, here's the end credits, play it, its fairly entertaining, but its just another Halo to me



              I had a feeling this was going to be the case for this game. I will hold out a month or so and pick up a good used copy for half the price then.

              To me there is nothing more disapointing when buying a $60 game, is it doesnt live up to the hype their marketing campaign made it to be. And only last 5 hours for the hard core gamer to beat.

              Thanks for the heads up !!

              Comment

              • bwanac
                No R3VLimiter
                • Oct 2003
                • 3354

                #37
                so everything i hear... the hype was not lived up to in terms of graphics... but is the gameplay the same? better? multiplayer of course... screw campaign.




                not that it matters,... i am waiting for the new revision of the 360 with new chipset.

                Comment

                Working...