gay marriage

[speedhop]

My input says, if they want to have the union of a marriage, which our argument says is based upon the idea of governmental acceptance and supposed "tax cuts"...let them! BUT keep it out of the church, if not we've seen it immediately create controversy. If the religious want to keep the sanctity of marriage "sacred" let them, but do not deny the expressive feelings of love simply because our traditional sense does not understand it.

/Done :)

[asubimmer]

40 to 31, you guys are fags...

[joshh]

Sure, let them get married......at least it would shut them the fuck up.

Religion is really the problem here. No religion and few people would actually give flying fuck.

[*R*]

40 to 31, you guys are fags...

Im sorry we support the rights of fellow human beings.

[Fidhle007]

40 to 31, you guys are fags...

Whatever you say Mr. Hasselhoff...

[Bill-B]

40 to 31, you guys are fags...

+1

[asubimmer]

Whatever you say Mr. Hasselhoff...

he gets more women than your fat bitch chasin dumbass (/topless e34 ;) ) could ever hope for

[Fidhle007]

he gets more women than your fat bitch chasin dumbass (/topless e34 ;) ) could ever hope for

QFT

[*R*]

he gets more women than your fat bitch chasin dumbass (/topless e34 ;) ) could ever hope for

that was rude. :down:
this discussion has nothing to do with his girlfriend

[asubimmer]

cry about it, he asked for it

he even agreed cause he knows how much of a pimp hoff is

[s0urce]

Not necessarily towards you, but towards anyone who debates this:

WHO THE FUCK CARES

Because you got to this thread way before I did. QFT

[decay]

its not funny. its sad.

well cheer up buddy, cuz it wasn't true to begin with.

My input says, if they want to have the union of a marriage, which our argument says is based upon the idea of governmental acceptance and supposed "tax cuts"...let them! BUT keep it out of the church, if not we've seen it immediately create controversy.

agree. and while we're at it let's keep the church out of the government as well. if not for that crowd, this wouldn't be a "hot-button" issue in the first place. attempting to legislate morality is also a slippery slope, and at the bottom you find examples like Sharia law in muslim countries.

[Purdue89E30]

OK, in my view, marriage is about love (and gay people can love), sex (gay people can have sex) and CHILDREN, (gay people can't breed) but gay people can adopt, but then those boys or girls would have a "not normal" role model.

I don't think of marriage as a way to get tax rebates, and let's say that taking the biblical issue out of the question, there's nature, unless a lesbian can get another lesbian pregnant, or a homosexual male can produce a rectal pregnancy in another male, i think NATURE is against it also.

That sphincter in particular is meant for something completely different to what gays use it for.

just my

You are aware that there are legally married heterosexual couples who choose not to have kids right? Isn't that a pretty big hole in the "Marriage exists to protect children" arguement?

Besides I saw an Arnold Schwartzenegger movie where a dude got preggers so ya never know what could happen.

[Fidhle007]

that was rude. :down:
this discussion has nothing to do with his girlfriend

Thanks, but it's alright. The girl in question is not, never has been, and probably never will be my girlfriend. She is a married friend of mine who, for better or for worse, posed semi-nude with her E34 and posted the pics on this site. R3v has never quite recovered and Asubimmer is still nursing his blue balls...

[Massive Lee]

Way beyond the religious, moral and cultural aspect of marriage (gay or heterosexual), the reason that guided the gay movement to push the recognition of gay marriage was purely a legal one. A gay couple may have been together for 30 years, when one of the "spouse" dies, the other has absolutely no right or claim. Insurance companies did not recognize those partners in life. Pension plans don't recognize it. I don't think it is right. Just my personal point of view.

In regard of the issue of the "sphincter" as stated earlier by a member, I kinda believe that nowadays it is used by as many heterosexuals as it is used by homosexuals. In some countries, it is a natural way of birth regulation. In other countires, a woman can be insulted if you refuse this "port on entrance". and in other countries, women only do it because heterosexual men want it.