SCOTUS rules in favor of the 2nd Amendment

[Vedubin01]

I hear what you are saying but Gun stores are hit all the time!

This was the recent one in FL that I remember reading. They go and get what they want when they want. Or at least try anyway.

http://news.jacksonville.com/justin/2008/06/23/gun-store-heist-foiled-at-taco-bell/

[E30 Cabrio]

The bottom line is that criminals will always prey on those whom they perceive to be weaker then they are, because inherently, they are cowards.

Allowing law-abiding citizens the chance to "even the playing field" is bad for criminals.

[Yakinho]

That's only based on the assumption that all criminals are stupid. And how do criminals inherit cowardness? The "evening the playing field" isn't bad for criminals at all, it increases the supply of wanted weapons.

[atomic]

I don't think thats true. I know there are states that you can (I wanna say Tennessee is one of them) but I'm fairly positive that MN isn't one.

Yes Tennessee you can carry in plain view if you choose too. ;)

[FlyingPrick]

LMFAO, you can't be that dense. Cops don't care where they got the weapon, unless they find out it was stolen from a person with the legal right to have it.

tell me how much law enforcement experience you have. how many firearms or larceny investigations have you conducted? shut up.

Criminals don't have the money to buy guns? Again LMFAO. Cost is not what criminals care about, it's availability. And gun shows make it very easy to buy a gun and walk out the door with it. Homes are constantly broken into so the criminal can steal your gun....lol

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/guns/procon/guns.html

OK. Let's say for the sake of argument that availability IS the only factor. Would gun shows top the list? Probably. BUT CRIMINALS ARE NOT BUYING GUNS AT GUN SHOWS ARE THEY? They get them through thefts and illegal straw purchases which i am well aware of but did not mention in my previous post. I'll say it again, a very small fraction of guns purchased at shows are used in crimes.

Smart and psycho are connected in what way??

she appears psycho to you because you lack the grey matter to comprehend. Don't worry. It comes with age and experience, of which you obviously have little of either.

Why do I need to name another one? There is no mental health box....how would the FBI know the guy is seeing a Psychiatrist?
No they got them from a gun show. You really didn't know that? You brought it up not me...
Nope criminals don't buy guys......lol

I can't speak for OR, but here there is a box which is to be checked by mental health personnel which states whether or not an individual is a danger to others through the course of their evaluation when one is detained for mental evaluation. This is what gets them on "the list". That is how Cho was able to legally purchase his guns, the mental health jack off didn't mark the right box and he wasn't put on the list of no-go's. out at columbine, was the root source of the guns a gun show? Apparently. HOWEVER, this anderson guy legally bought the guns at the show, not klebold and harris. it was an illegal straw purchase by anderson. So no, klebold and harris did not go to a gun show and buy the guns. anderson did, with the intention of selling or otherwise transferring them to the minors which is illegal. It's like this. Person X could sell Person Y a car. Person Y could drive the car straight from Person X's driveway and into some soccer moms at the ball field. Or not, Person Y could be responsible with it. Person X could sell Person Y a car, and Person Y could drive it from X's driveway with the sole intention to resell it to someone else (Person Z) who intends to drive it into some soccer moms (whether this is known or unknown to Y) because Z cannot legally buy a car from X. where did Person Z get the car? Person Y. They certainly didn't get it from X, now did they? Who gets blamed? Person Y. X didn't cause the soccer moms to get plowed over, Y did. There is no X-Z relationship. The guns were legally transferred from "gun show" to "anderson" and then illegally from "anderson" to "klebold/harris" unbeknownst to "gun show". There is no "gun show" to "klebold/harris" route. why should "gun show" be held accountable for "klebold/harris" when "gun show's" legal transaction was with "anderson?" "anderson" has his dick in the wind, not "gun show."

[joshh]

tell me how much law enforcement experience you have. how many firearms or larceny investigations have you conducted? shut up.

All you have is a shut up. LMAO.

OK. Let's say for the sake of argument that availability IS the only factor. Would gun shows top the list? Probably. BUT CRIMINALS ARE NOT BUYING GUNS AT GUN SHOWS ARE THEY? They get them through thefts and illegal straw purchases which i am well aware of but did not mention in my previous post. I'll say it again, a very small fraction of guns purchased at shows are used in crimes.

And like I already mentioned, THEY ARE PURCHASED THERE. Period.

she appears psycho to you because you lack the grey matter to comprehend. Don't worry. It comes with age and experience, of which you obviously have little of either.

No, she is psycho.
Yes that's why I proved you wrong about the Columbine guns. And the fact you made the stabbing assumption that I'm a leftist. Nice "experience" you have there.

I can't speak for OR, but here there is a box which is to be checked by mental health personnel which states whether or not an individual is a danger to others through the course of their evaluation when one is detained for mental evaluation. This is what gets them on "the list". That is how Cho was able to legally purchase his guns, the mental health jack off didn't mark the right box and he wasn't put on the list of no-go's. out at columbine, was the root source of the guns a gun show? Apparently. HOWEVER, this anderson guy legally bought the guns at the show, not klebold and harris. it was an illegal straw purchase by anderson. So no, klebold and harris did not go to a gun show and buy the guns. anderson did, with the intention of selling or otherwise transferring them to the minors which is illegal. It's like this. Person X could sell Person Y a car. Person Y could drive the car straight from Person X's driveway and into some soccer moms at the ball field. Or not, Person Y could be responsible with it. Person X could sell Person Y a car, and Person Y could drive it from X's driveway with the sole intention to resell it to someone else (Person Z) who intends to drive it into some soccer moms (whether this is known or unknown to Y) because Z cannot legally buy a car from X. where did Person Z get the car? Person Y. They certainly didn't get it from X, now did they? Who gets blamed? Person Y. X didn't cause the soccer moms to get plowed over, Y did. There is no X-Z relationship. The guns were legally transferred from "gun show" to "anderson" and then illegally from "anderson" to "klebold/harris" unbeknownst to "gun show". There is no "gun show" to "klebold/harris" route. why should "gun show" be held accountable for "klebold/harris" when "gun show's" legal transaction was with "anderson?" "anderson" has his dick in the wind, not "gun show."

How many times are you going to split that hair?
Your argument......"Their friends buy the gun for the criminal, therefor the criminal isn't the buyer, therefor they aren't responsible for the gun being in their hand."




You said the Columbine guns were not from a gun show.
Yet you think that cops interviewing criminals is how they get such accurate statistics on how many people get guns from gun shows.

Head out of the sand please.

[CorvallisBMW]

The homicide rate in DC is going to double, mark my words. Fat lot of good the right to own a gun does you if your dead.

[Pinepig]

The homicide rate in DC is going to double, mark my words. Fat lot of good the right to own a gun does you if your dead.

God I hope so, I justifiable homicide is still a homicide. the stats you stupid fucks read don't split them up.

[CorvallisBMW]

God I hope so, I justifiable homicide is still a homicide. the stats you stupid fucks read don't split them up.

Wait a second, you're saying you hope the murder rate goes up? You hope people get shot and die?

[Vedubin01]

Funny thing is I have owned a gun since I was 6 and I have never shot anyone and never been close to shooting someone. Who are you to tell me as a citizen of this country what is good or not good for me. As long as I play by the rules there is no reason to take that right away.

[CorvallisBMW]

Funny thing is I have owned a gun since I was 6 and I have never shot anyone and never been close to shooting someone. Who are you to tell me as a citizen of this country what is good or not good for me. As long as I play by the rules there is no reason to take that right away.

The problem isn't people like you who play by the rules. The problem is people who don't play by the rules. Dumb kids who get in fights and shoot each other. Drunk husbands who shoot their wives during domestic disputes. Gang violence, accidental shootings, etc......

[Pinepig]

Wait a second, you're saying you hope the murder rate goes up? You hope people get shot and die?

Homicide is different from murder, but you are a fuckstick who can't read so it's OK.

And yes I hope bad guys get shot in mass quantities.

[Pinepig]

The problem isn't people like you who play by the rules. The problem is people who don't play by the rules. Dumb kids who get in fights and shoot each other. Drunk husbands who shoot their wives during domestic disputes. Gang violence, accidental shootings, etc......

So us people who play by the rules should suffer because of the folks who aren't following laws anyway by passing more laws that they aren't going to follow.

Just fucking brilliant.

Read John Lott, More guns, less crime. He was an anti who set out to find the truth, look at the title of his book.

[hugh jass]

So us people who play by the rules should suffer because of the folks who aren't following laws anyway by passing more laws that they aren't going to follow.

Just fucking brilliant.

Read John Lott, More guns, less crime. He was an anti who set out to find the truth, look at the title of his book.

So what sort of gun regulation do you think there should be, if any?

[CorvallisBMW]

Homicide is different from murder, but you are a fuckstick who can't read so it's OK.

And yes I hope bad guys get shot in mass quantities.

Wow dude, chill out.