Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alternative Energies: Different kinds and a few thoughts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by smonkbmw View Post
    lol, have you?

    there should be a larger gas guzzler tax placed on the heavier SUVs, sports cars. maybe 2-3x as much. include "untuned" vehicles i.e. old buick century's, dodge caravans that emit large emissions and use more than its share of fuel. the tax should be added at time of registration or tab renewal so people cant try and skate it.

    as far as energy goes im all for nuclear power. im also for opening that bonneville dam another 3-4" so it can crank out a lil more power. i dont think it even operates close to its potential at all. if there are large supplies of crude in canada and alaska i dont understand why there isnt more of a push to get at it. wouldnt the cost of acquiring it make it a reasonable choice in the long run?
    You have a point but I don't think that the tax on the big cars is needed, they are taking it in the shorts every time they pull up to the pump.

    You can't really tax the untuned cars because they are generally operated by people who don't have the money to maintain them. So taxing those people will only have more impact on the economy that is negative; not create many net benefits.
    PNW Crew
    90 m3
    06 m5

    Comment


      #32
      I think that if we stopped wasting energy in america, we'd be better off already :-)
      Build Threads:
      Pamela/Bella/Betty/325ix/5-Lug Seta/S60R/Miata ITB/Miata Turbo/Miata VVT/951/325xi-6

      Comment


        #33
        Awesome thread, uofom3. Thanks for posting.

        I wonder if there would be any benefit if everybody started using synthethic oil in their engines instead of mineral oil. Does anybody have any information or statistics regarding that? I bet it would be very little, though, but it makes me think.

        If I was building a new house I would factor in the costs of solar panels for sure. I mean, just being outside building a house you realize just how much the sun beats down on the roof of a house. Plus, you cited that only 10% is utilized from solar power... Well, that's quite a bit when you think about it. I often think about schools and other huge buildings like factories that must consume huge amounts of electricity where 10% is going to quickly add up. Considering the huge flat roofs some of these buildings have, you could easily cover them with solar panels and it's not like anybody is even going to notice or potentionally complain that they're eyesores.

        Also, working with my dad in home construction, I learned just how important a proper heating and cooling design, as well as superb insulation can affect the amount of electricity is consumed. My dad is absolutely fanatic when it comes to insulation and making sure that a house can "breath." The owner of a house that we built a couple years ago was ecstatic that he had to rarely turn on the AC in his house because it did such a fantastic job of holding the cold air in and keeping the hot air out.
        My Feedback

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by E30 Wagen View Post
          Awesome thread, uofom3. Thanks for posting.

          I wonder if there would be any benefit if everybody started using synthethic oil in their engines instead of mineral oil. Does anybody have any information or statistics regarding that? I bet it would be very little, though, but it makes me think.

          If I was building a new house I would factor in the costs of solar panels for sure. I mean, just being outside building a house you realize just how much the sun beats down on the roof of a house. Plus, you cited that only 10% is utilized from solar power... Well, that's quite a bit when you think about it. I often think about schools and other huge buildings like factories that must consume huge amounts of electricity where 10% is going to quickly add up. Considering the huge flat roofs some of these buildings have, you could easily cover them with solar panels and it's not like anybody is even going to notice or potentionally complain that they're eyesores.

          Also, working with my dad in home construction, I learned just how important a proper heating and cooling design, as well as superb insulation can affect the amount of electricity is consumed. My dad is absolutely fanatic when it comes to insulation and making sure that a house can "breath." The owner of a house that we built a couple years ago was ecstatic that he had to rarely turn on the AC in his house because it did such a fantastic job of holding the cold air in and keeping the hot air out.
          You raised an awesome point there. How much could be saved by going to synthetic oil, having everyone change their air filter, and new plugs/rotor/cap? Maybe a fuel filter while you're at it.

          Also, I wonder how much clogged CATconverters are hurting the gas consumption? Most people wait to get a new one until the thing literally cannot expel exhaust gas any longer. That much back pressure can't be helping efficiency.

          Finally, I noticed this the other day when I went to do an oil change on the x5 for the first time (previously had it done at the stealer). I go down to G.I. Joes (sports and outdoor store in the PNW) to buy 9 quarts of mobil 1 10/30 synthetic. They went for something like $6 a quart, might have been in the high $5 range. Regardless, I remember paying virtually that exact same amount for the product 7 years ago when I was daily driving the m3. I just thought it was funny that though gas prices have gone $2 since then, the price of the motor oil in my engine has remained virtually unchanged.
          PNW Crew
          90 m3
          06 m5

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Money$hift View Post
            Nuclear is another solution that I am not opposed to. Aside from nuclear waste, it is remarkably clean. United States has taken a lesson right from Russia, (chernobyl), and decided to stay away from Nuclear. Costs are "too high" in terms of human life. A nuclear explosion, without any need to explain, can cause mass distruction, and ultimately the cost is human life. What is not realized is that expulsion of fossil fuels into the atmosphere also has societal costs. Humans, animals and plants are pay these costs as well.
            I'm not trying to come off harsh if it seems that way because its obvious you just don't know, and to be honest its not your job to know. I do consider it my job to inform you otherwise. I hate to sound cliche, but it is a media stigmata that brings forth this large misunderstanding of nuclear power.

            Everyone needs to see this:
            A nuclear reactor cannot physically explode. PERIOD. The operating conditions are not correct to allow an explosion. Even if the control rods fall out of the reactor and the main and auxiliary cooling systems fail, the reactor will never explode. If everything that could possible go wrong does go wrong, the worst thing that could happen is Three Mile Island (do research -- it was actually a great success in showing that the design of these plants works beautifully). The containment leak that happened at Chernobyl is impossible with any plant in this country.

            Another point while I'm on my soap-box. Spent fuel (as per what we are spitting out in this country at this time) only takes ~400 years to reach the radioactivity level that it started at when it was taken from the earth. Not quite what opponents try to portray. I'm not denying that spent fuel is nasty stuff, but it is not nasty forever.

            Comment


              #36
              I just thought it was funny that though gas prices have gone $2 since then, the price of the motor oil in my engine has remained virtually unchanged.
              Yeah..that's because fuel products are paying for the elevated price of oil. The byproducts like the varnishes, laquers, paints, plastics, lubricants, etc are generally the same price.

              How much could be saved by going to synthetic oil, having everyone change their air filter, and new plugs/rotor/cap? Maybe a fuel filter while you're at it. Also, I wonder how much clogged CATconverters are hurting the gas consumption?
              That would ideal in a perfect world but I believe that people who don't maintain their cars can't afford it. And if they have a few bucks, they aren't willing to break their budget unless the car breaks down. They are having a hard enough keeping the needle off of "E" (or the "R") living one paycheck to the next. I seriously doubt that the average minimum wage earner wants to spend a week's salary for a few extra MPG at the pump let alone a month's salary for a new catalytic converter.

              And don't get me wrong. It makes sense to make an investment in the health of your car in order for it to remain dependable even if fuel economy wasn't an issue. But not everyone has the luxury of doing a complete tuneup or buying a new cat.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by netcsk View Post
                I'm not trying to come off harsh if it seems that way because its obvious you just don't know, and to be honest its not your job to know. I do consider it my job to inform you otherwise. I hate to sound cliche, but it is a media stigmata that brings forth this large misunderstanding of nuclear power.

                Everyone needs to see this:
                A nuclear reactor cannot physically explode. PERIOD. The operating conditions are not correct to allow an explosion. Even if the control rods fall out of the reactor and the main and auxiliary cooling systems fail, the reactor will never explode. If everything that could possible go wrong does go wrong, the worst thing that could happen is Three Mile Island (do research -- it was actually a great success in showing that the design of these plants works beautifully). The containment leak that happened at Chernobyl is impossible with any plant in this country.

                Another point while I'm on my soap-box. Spent fuel (as per what we are spitting out in this country at this time) only takes ~400 years to reach the radioactivity level that it started at when it was taken from the earth. Not quite what opponents try to portray. I'm not denying that spent fuel is nasty stuff, but it is not nasty forever.
                awesome. start a thread about the realities of nuclear energy - this is good stuff and thanks for contributing
                PNW Crew
                90 m3
                06 m5

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by uofom3 View Post
                  I go down to G.I. Joes (sports and outdoor store in the PNW) to buy 9 quarts of mobil 1 10/30 synthetic. They went for something like $6 a quart, might have been in the high $5 range. Regardless, I remember paying virtually that exact same amount for the product 7 years ago when I was daily driving the m3. I just thought it was funny that though gas prices have gone $2 since then, the price of the motor oil in my engine has remained virtually unchanged.
                  Fuck I need to buy my Mobil 1 there! Even Costco charges more than that! I'm sick of paying like $7.49 at most auto parts stores. expensive oil changes FTL. Even Wal-Mart and Bi-Mart are like $6.50

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by CorvallisBMW View Post
                    Fuck I need to buy my Mobil 1 there! Even Costco charges more than that! I'm sick of paying like $7.49 at most auto parts stores. expensive oil changes FTL. Even Wal-Mart and Bi-Mart are like $6.50
                    no joke... it was sub 6 at the time. I bought ams-oil for the m3 the other day for less than 5.50 a quart!
                    PNW Crew
                    90 m3
                    06 m5

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by 2Big4a3Series View Post
                      Yeah..that's because fuel products are paying for the elevated price of oil. The byproducts like the varnishes, laquers, paints, plastics, lubricants, etc are generally the same price.



                      That would ideal in a perfect world but I believe that people who don't maintain their cars can't afford it. And if they have a few bucks, they aren't willing to break their budget unless the car breaks down. They are having a hard enough keeping the needle off of "E" (or the "R") living one paycheck to the next. I seriously doubt that the average minimum wage earner wants to spend a week's salary for a few extra MPG at the pump let alone a month's salary for a new catalytic converter.

                      And don't get me wrong. It makes sense to make an investment in the health of your car in order for it to remain dependable even if fuel economy wasn't an issue. But not everyone has the luxury of doing a complete tuneup or buying a new cat.
                      You are completely correct here... i guess I was speaking in more hypothetical terms. People in those positions will certainly not go down that path twoards total automobile efficiency.
                      PNW Crew
                      90 m3
                      06 m5

                      Comment


                        #41
                        what is the rule in japan? i cant remember exactly but i think theres some sort of law that cars after a certain mileage are taxed more than new cars? i think this would make a good impact here. it definitely would inspire more public transportation if not more bicycling.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          If the US dollar was not so inflated, then fuel prices would not seem as high. If the US $ was equal to one Euro, as in 2002, then we would currently pay an average price of $2.55 a gallon. An econ professor at school said he would not doubt if the world economy goes to pricing barrels of oil in Euros, since the inflated US dollar is going to shit. The Euro now has the highest combined cash value of all currencies, with ~500M people using it.
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                            #43
                            The euro is so strong against the dollar that there are merchants in many major US cities that are accepting it. The last time I was in NYC I was shocked to find out that there were resturants and coffee shops in midtown manhattan that had 2 prices lists depending on the currency that you wanted to use.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by 2Big4a3Series View Post
                              The euro is so strong against the dollar that there are merchants in many major US cities that are accepting it. The last time I was in NYC I was shocked to find out that there were resturants and coffee shops in midtown manhattan that had 2 prices lists depending on the currency that you wanted to use.
                              That may have more to do with tourists than the exchange rate.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by netcsk View Post
                                A nuclear reactor cannot physically explode.
                                -this is true, they makeup of a reactor and a bomb are very different.
                                1989 cirrisblau-metallic 325i

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X