LOL, take that Liberal Media!!! Obama campaign charging media Election Night fees

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Maluco
    R3V OG
    • Oct 2005
    • 6572

    #1

    LOL, take that Liberal Media!!! Obama campaign charging media Election Night fees

    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.



    Obama campaign charging media Election Night fees

    By DEANNA BELLANDI, Associated Press Writer Deanna Bellandi, Associated Press Writer Wed Oct 22, 6:33 pm ET
    CHICAGO – Media organizations will have to pay up if they want a prime spot to cover Democrat Barack Obama's Election Night party in a downtown lakefront park.
    Obama's campaign, awash in money after raising a record-shattering $150 million last month, is asking news organizations to pay anywhere from $410 to $1,870 depending on where they want to be and if they want telephone or Internet service in Grant Park.
    While it is customary for news organizations to pay their way when covering a presidential campaign, including transportation, hotels and Internet services, some have questioned the Obama campaign's plan.
    "It smells a lot like paying for access," said Al Tompkins, a former TV news director who teaches broadcast and online journalism at the Poynter Institute in St. Petersburg, Fla.
    For $1,870, a news organization can buy space on a main riser that will be covered, plus phone and Internet service, while $410 will get them space on a separate riser for photographers without out phone or Internet access, but with electrical power. A seat in a heated press filing center will cost $935 and include power, cable TV, Internet and food.
    There is one press credential reporters can get for free. It will provide access to a standing-room-only outdoor press area with no services that "may have obstructed views."
    Obama's campaign says it's charging the media only for the services it will be providing them, not for coverage, and that such fees are "standard procedure" in presidential campaigns.
    "There is no fee to cover our Election Night event. News organizations will be able to cover our event without charge, with full access to our campaign advisers," Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt said in a statement.
    LaBolt, in a later statement, added that the campaign "would be surprised" if any news organization would expect it to subsidize coverage "given the appearance conflicts that could create."
    The event will be free and open to the public.
    Republican John McCain's campaign did not immediately provide details Wednesday about media arrangements for its Election Night event in Phoenix.
    Tompkins said it's typical for media to pay for telecommunications services but he said he was unaware of news organizations having to pay for platform space to cover an event.
    Access to covered and heated areas could be key in November when Chicago weather can be fickle for an outdoor event.
    Fred Brown, former national president of the Society of Professional Journalists, said the Obama campaign's fee list is a "mercenary way" to approach coverage.
    "It seems to needlessly create ill will," said Brown, a retired capitol bureau chief for The Denver Post who still writes regularly for the newspaper.
    ___
    On the Net:

    Obama: http://www.barackobama.com McCain: http://www.johnmccain.com

    Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.



    Copyright © 2008 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
  • eric (^__^)
    E30 Fanatic
    • Dec 2007
    • 1409

    #2
    maybe they'll spend the money on clothes though
    Not that I care, of course.

    Comment

    • DarkWing6
      Moderator
      • Apr 2004
      • 7144

      #3
      I'm sure all that money will be going to the needy. We've all seen Obama and Biden's giving records.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • Turf1600
        R3V OG
        • Nov 2006
        • 9815

        #4
        I don't see what the problem is. It says in the article that it's standard practice - and thet they are only being charged for services rendered.

        It's like paying for box seats in football. Everyone sees the same game - some pay more to be more comfortable.
        "We praise or find fault, depending on which of the two provides more opportunity for our powers of judgement to shine."

        Comment

        • Massive Lee
          R3V OG
          • Sep 2006
          • 6782

          #5
          If the building, where the Obama camp stays, costs a lot of $$$ (especially if internet and phone connections are required), I guess that reporters or users shall help pay their share...
          Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

          massivebrakes.com

          http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056





          Comment

          • DarkWing6
            Moderator
            • Apr 2004
            • 7144

            #6
            If all this was so normal, why are they reporting on it?
            sigpic

            Comment

            • Turf1600
              R3V OG
              • Nov 2006
              • 9815

              #7
              Originally posted by DarkWing6
              If all this was so normal, why are they reporting on it?
              That's like the most ridiculous statement I've heard today. Even the report says it's normal.
              "We praise or find fault, depending on which of the two provides more opportunity for our powers of judgement to shine."

              Comment

              • DarkWing6
                Moderator
                • Apr 2004
                • 7144

                #8
                Originally posted by Turf1600
                That's like the most ridiculous statement I've heard today. Even the report says it's normal.

                some have questioned the Obama campaign's plan
                Tompkins said it's typical for media to pay for telecommunications services but he said he was unaware of news organizations having to pay for platform space to cover an event.
                sigpic

                Comment

                • Turf1600
                  R3V OG
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 9815

                  #9
                  Access to covered and heated areas could be key in November when Chicago weather can be fickle for an outdoor event.
                  That's what makes it marginally irregular. There's free space, just not covered or heated. Reporters are getting what they pay for. what's the big deal?
                  "We praise or find fault, depending on which of the two provides more opportunity for our powers of judgement to shine."

                  Comment

                  • SpecM
                    R3V Elite
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 4531

                    #10
                    More whineing from the liberal media?

                    lol
                    1989 cirrisblau-metallic 325i

                    Comment

                    • Aptyp
                      R3V OG
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 6584

                      #11
                      Actually, I have to agree with Obama here. Media has to pay up to poop on his parade.


                      What bothers me more, is the lack of media coverage on thesis, law practice, donations, and senate documents from Obama, and lack for records for earmarks from Biden up to date. It bothers me, that media goes after personal e-mails of any candidate. It bothers me that media goes after close relatives of candidates.

                      Like saying that Biden's son is a lobbyist, is unethical. His company is only paid millions for lobbying for Delaware university. Lobbying for education is alright with me.

                      McCain using his wife's airplain for campaign purposes? Is that really a big deal? If you had a plane, wouldn't you use it? Silly that he even has to pay for it.

                      I would much rather media pick apart candidates records than their personal affairs.

                      Media sucks, and deserves to pay.

                      Comment

                      • Ral
                        E30 Fanatic
                        • Jul 2007
                        • 1486

                        #12
                        ^^completely agree. Particularly about Obama's birth certificates. If he's commander in chief and therefore the head person in charge of upholding the constitution and the ideals contained within it, shouldn't he at least prove that he's eligible for the position? If there's at least one place where it's not ambiguous, I want to be confident that it's followed to the letter. Biden's earmarks would also be important. And, the source of all his campaign contributions ($150 mil didn't come from college students) also makes me question. I'd ask the same of any candidate besides personal finances but this election, it seems McCain has been more transparent than Obama.
                        sigpic89 M3

                        Comment

                        • dinanm3atl
                          R3V OG
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 7305

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Ral
                          ^^completely agree. Particularly about Obama's birth certificates. If he's commander in chief and therefore the head person in charge of upholding the constitution and the ideals contained within it, shouldn't he at least prove that he's eligible for the position? If there's at least one place where it's not ambiguous, I want to be confident that it's followed to the letter. Biden's earmarks would also be important. And, the source of all his campaign contributions ($150 mil didn't come from college students) also makes me question. I'd ask the same of any candidate besides personal finances but this election, it seems McCain has been more transparent than Obama.
                          Yah but 20 bucks for hundreds of thousands of people paying for 'change' adds up quick.

                          I think many will be asking for their money back ;)

                          Comment

                          • z31maniac
                            I waste 90% of my day here and all I got was this stupid title
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 17566

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Aptyp
                            Actually, I have to agree with Obama here. Media has to pay up to poop on his parade.
                            I guess I've been reading and seeing different media then you.
                            Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
                            Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries

                            www.gutenparts.com
                            One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!

                            Comment

                            • Ral
                              E30 Fanatic
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 1486

                              #15
                              I read that half of Obama's contributions come from donations of $200 or less. That's half of 600,000,000 (at least) paid for, and adds up to 1.5 million people, probably more, shelling out $200.

                              Also, why are more people not bitching about the $5 Billion spent on elections?
                              sigpic89 M3

                              Comment

                              Working...