007 *spoiler* do not read if you intend on seeing it!!!!

[YAN-3]

the new Bond movie sucked complete a$$. wow i almost fell asleep. VERY VERY disappointed. that is all.

[YAN-3]

yea ok ill give it that, but the movie, the story and plot were so bad! i mean it wasnt even interesting. I still dont know what it was all about. what happened to the old dude from the beginning? and what or who are these people that are everywhere? why does James Bond have to get involved in politics and US oil or no oil thirst. Damn it, i want the old bond movies back.

[alexw]

Agree 100%. I saw it on Thursday over here. Waste of 7.50 euro.

[alexw]

The whole movie was SLLLOOOWWW with the exception of a few scenes in the beginning.

I think you're alone (Spanos) in thinking it was pretty badass... Though I could be wrong.

[Atreus]

it was.....alright. needs more cowbell. i mean. plot.

yeah....

[smonkbmw]

saw the midnight showing friday morning. it was laaaaaaaaaame. i mean if youre going to make a movie to kind of "end" the last, make it relate some how and be good. all that this last movie did was leave it open for another sequel. the car was cool, daniel craig played the role well, the russian chick sucked (she was almost better in HitMan), the bad guy was lame. the plot lacked. and i kept getting motion sick from the camera bouncing everywhere in the foot race/chase scenes, thats annoying.

[aintnothang]

It was meh. Old bonds are just so much more enjoyable.

[ethirtydavid]

fuck the new bond movies
a famous man once said,.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D9S48A81os

[s0urce]

What is everyones thoughts on casino royalle that said this one sucked?

[smonkbmw]

i liked casino royale much better. the villain was a villain, not some punk ass. the plot was much better. the leading lady was a MUCH better actor, and attractive IMO. i was leery going to watch casino royale the first time cause i couldnt see anyone but pierce brosnan playing bond, but i was surprised afterwards, it was a good movie all around.

[YAN-3]

saw the midnight showing friday morning. it was laaaaaaaaaame. i mean if youre going to make a movie to kind of "end" the last, make it relate some how and be good. all that this last movie did was leave it open for another sequel. the car was cool, daniel craig played the role well, the russian chick sucked (she was almost better in HitMan), the bad guy was lame. the plot lacked. and i kept getting motion sick from the camera bouncing everywhere in the foot race/chase scenes, thats annoying.

It was meh. Old bonds are just so much more enjoyable.

agree and agree. but I think Casino Royal was a bit on the lame side as well. too complicated and too slow. plus where were the catch phrases and theme songs?

[joehasane30]

The whole movie was SLLLOOOWWW with the exception of a few scenes in the beginning.

I think you're alone (Spanos) in thinking it was pretty badass... Though I could be wrong.

hes definitly alone that movie wus really bad. and im rating ur avatar 10/10 alexw just because its elwood blues.

[Desaevious]

This movie jumped around the whole time in the 1h 46m it had. They give you some more members of the organization that was alluded to in Casino Royale, but it when Quantum ended it just barely scratched the surface of the organization, because Greene was probably just some tool of the organization. As badass as it was, it seems like you could have not seen this movie and went from the end of Casino Royale to Bond 24 and not missed a whole lot of plot.

[Charlie]

What is everyones thoughts on casino royalle that said this one sucked?

The reviews I've read have pretty much said that this is just Casino Royale part 1.5, rather than a 4 hour movie they made it two films.

-Charlie

[aintnothang]

That touch screen computer was pretty legit.