The clarification was because of this comment,
And did you not see the no private property rule? Granted you could argue road and rail bridges, light poles (stickers) etc... belong to all of us since its government property. BUT the point is not to ruin anyone's personal property. That's just cruel why would I want to destroy someones fence that they worked for so their kids can play in the back yard?
Its not so black and white as you make it out to be.
--Korea
edit: I'm all for a lock, who knew r3v was such a powder keg? I guess I should lurk more.
And did you not see the no private property rule? Granted you could argue road and rail bridges, light poles (stickers) etc... belong to all of us since its government property. BUT the point is not to ruin anyone's personal property. That's just cruel why would I want to destroy someones fence that they worked for so their kids can play in the back yard?
Its not so black and white as you make it out to be.
--Korea
edit: I'm all for a lock, who knew r3v was such a powder keg? I guess I should lurk more.
Comment